Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:88573
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.213.49 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAESVnVrBq9_QUsKLHDRWd3h3SEfPr+W+tCerpHaU71=QznDEiA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALW=WEBPC2N2tzmU1uB_v93YXLa1MA97=0_q7zP0F6G+uRPDNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<56095A0C.4070306@cubiclesoft.com>
	<CAFMT4NqaqVX-KHh9iz_R05wxp2h=aajv5RuQGh2EQVSNHoLGaQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6cgVrqh0PNYybcrk4_X36m5K=dp280G=7OfzjYBzxJpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAESVnVpG1MK4pkjOYC0CHYw8=yndAfd9gaDOkfTCd7fPja_2pQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+9eiLssZtsTC8_dgr4UKgpxQsc=khswvgrfxtB7O4D0UKO7Ug@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAESVnVrBq9_QUsKLHDRWd3h3SEfPr+W+tCerpHaU71=QznDEiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 01:34:26 +0300
Message-ID: <CA+9eiLtDqQhPCKgaGqk_oNwhL5WsY7GOpGOt0HG2TAqKdPvKMQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>
Cc: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>, Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>, 
	PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, Thomas Hruska <thruska@cubiclesoft.com>, 
	"S.A.N" <ua.san.alex@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11415a8e9f035e0520ea6a2e
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] async/await - is future reserved words in PHP 7.x?
From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov)

--001a11415a8e9f035e0520ea6a2e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:
> > I think, we don't need to reserve words, until we decide to implement
> this.
> > The context sensitive scanner introduced in 7.0 makes the problem less
> > serious.
> >
> > $ sapi/cli/php -r 'class foo { static function use() {echo "ok\n";}}
> > foo::use();'
> > ok
> >
> I actually do agree, I was just winding up Pierre over his "totally
> failed" assertion with a counter-example. :)
>
>
> > Is the semantic of async/await in Hack and Dart is the same?
> >
> If I knew what Dart's semantics were, I could tell you. :)
> I do know it's based on C#'s implementation (as are many other
> async/await implementations from what I'm told).
>

Could you please take a quick look, because I afraid, that identical syntax
in different languages implements quite different semantic (I would be glad
to be wrong).

https://www.dartlang.org/articles/event-loop/
https://www.dartlang.org/articles/await-async/
https://www.dartlang.org/articles/beyond-async/

Thanks. Dmitry,


>
> -Sara
>

--001a11415a8e9f035e0520ea6a2e--