Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:88493
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain belski.net from 85.214.73.107 cause and error)
To: "'PHP internals'" <internals@lists.php.net>
Cc: "'Andrey Hristov'" <php@hristov.com>,
	"'Dmitry Stogov'" <dmitry@zend.com>,
	"'Nikita Popov'" <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
References: <5523DF0E.6000500@hristov.com> <CA+9eiLsC0+HFtHXc+jJioYyjDfvGB3p9JZHKG7PnFfZ+a-uHkg@mail.gmail.com> <5523F025.5070407@hristov.com> <CA+9eiLu2fR5RkTjCEDCgq=BT6rb4c=YkRbYVKq3r1r6pVHE7FQ@mail.gmail.com> <5603B414.2050508@oracle.com> <CA+9eiLvQaXkaOS8S2g-Qm5rt0ddDQ1xHAB_198=R4VfBQTkJqw@mail.gmail.com> <5603F6FC.5080609@oracle.com> <CA+9eiLuAQudD6F2vBs1Bf0z9+zhYvoKyKgQmSH6DXk4y99RT6g@mail.gmail.com> <56040355.5000007@oracle.com> <CA+9eiLutHpKtNSv=gJGjTE4NB+80BYcGJsfi7vicLEJqSWpwwA@mail.gmail.com> <014201d0f6d7$44b99940$ce2ccbc0$@belski.net> <5604176D.8080500@oracle.com> <017501d0f6e8$d9803cd0$8c80b670$@belski.net>
In-Reply-To: <017501d0f6e8$d9803cd0$8c80b670$@belski.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:17:32 +0200
Message-ID: <026d01d0f76a$a21a48d0$e64eda70$@belski.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AQGhRPMnPF8/APDCqqpmdcCm/016EwEK3zMQAgUS670CX5tl9gG3JnWKAnoPeRACNHgmCgIBJU+yAdELfbwCNOiIAQJ3obkMA213ENoBQ8YNZJ3kIA4g
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: FW: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PATCH] Tick functions (on C level) with state
From: anatol.php@belski.net ("Anatol Belski")


FYI the patch http://pastebin.com/wVymMAdZ , forwarding as seems my mail =
filters put it into the internals folder while there was no internals in =
the "to" list.

Regards

Anatol

-----Original Message-----
From: Anatol Belski [mailto:anatol.php@belski.net]=20
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 6:49 PM
To: 'Andrey Hristov' <andrey.hristov@oracle.com>; 'Dmitry Stogov' =
<dmitry@zend.com>
Cc: 'Anatol Belski' <ab@php.net>; 'Nikita Popov' <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PATCH] Tick functions (on C level) with =
state

Andrey,

Thanks for the explanation. Please proceed the patch. The risks of it =
are quite low and the benefits from the new MySQL features would =
outweigh in any case :)

Regards

Anatol

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrey Hristov [mailto:andrey.hristov@oracle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 5:32 PM
>=20
>   Hi Dmitry, Anatol,
> this is the only thing that I would like to go into 7.0 . The code=20
> that will use the new ticks will be a mysqlnd plugin and will live in =
PECL.
> If the functionality is accepted by the community, then it will find=20
> its way into mysqli/mysqlnd. This way mysqli/mysqlnd will not be =
destabilized in 7.0 .
>=20
> Regarding the ticks, if no extension registers them, there is no=20
> overhead. The PECL extension, which will overload mysqlnd semantics,=20
> like mysqlnd-ms, mysqlnd-mc etc. do, will be declared experimental.=20
> When using experimental features things can be slower. A warning will =
be put in the documentation.
>=20
> All in all, this will help testing new features but in the common case =

> it won't hurt anyone who is not using ticks. The patch doesn't make=20
> the performance of ticks worse, it allows flexibility :)
>=20
> I am sure there is a better way to do async, however adding it is not=20
> as simple as this patch.
>=20
>=20
> Best,
> Andrey