Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:88482 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61767 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2015 20:38:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Sep 2015 20:38:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=bjorn.x.larsson@telia.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=bjorn.x.larsson@telia.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain telia.com from 81.236.60.156 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: bjorn.x.larsson@telia.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.236.60.156 v-smtpout3.han.skanova.net Received: from [81.236.60.156] ([81.236.60.156:57421] helo=v-smtpout3.han.skanova.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C1/60-58589-95F54065 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:38:50 -0400 Received: from [192.168.7.6] ([195.198.188.252]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id fDHxZUw3xeMwUfDHxZYI7m; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 22:38:45 +0200 To: Stanislav Malyshev References: <28.4D.56639.BB071065@pb1.pair.com> <5603A202.4070003@gmail.com> <5603D706.3040503@telia.com> <56043F20.8040205@gmail.com> Cc: PHP internals Message-ID: <56045F57.4040400@telia.com> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 22:38:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56043F20.8040205@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfF6XCQt4pu101pWAKwmvxhrJNvGaQtVaj+EXrAf1nA6C9KnzG0BKsIFhwS7N8I1FgTARaWVqoPfHpN7EwgdkwXxjMkJ6dmzSvS2y/kFS8PLNYo2ZdYJB/l6iILuedEHkF7/zXMd4k63hCrcwQPpg7K8OlI/sxY7u7qLFpUMgBu5q/h3o6HJRos+x6wATfAiq3/5enw0DBTB7U172uMHMCJIuyXKSgZ9U4DvLgxTGsU0s Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Short Closures From: bjorn.x.larsson@telia.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Bj=c3=b6rn_Larsson?=) Den 2015-09-24 kl. 20:21, skrev Stanislav Malyshev: > Hi! > >> How does one then address that this RFC only covers a subset of >> Hacklang functionality when having the same operator? > Why one should address it? PHP is a different language, and we are under > no obligation to completely match functionality of any other language. In principal I agree, but by using the same operator one sets an end-user expectation that the functionality is close to the same. Regards //Björn Larsson