Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:87878 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 32572 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2015 14:57:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Aug 2015 14:57:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.17.22 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.17.22 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.17.22] ([212.227.17.22:59017] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 22/31-27100-84FD9D55 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:57:14 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([88.134.66.33]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MEFqW-1ZVjdz1Sv2-00FWcP; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:57:07 +0200 To: Anatol Belski , 'Nikita Popov' References: <55CA26DF.3030109@gmx.de> <03dd01d0d476$c75b6730$56123590$@belski.net> <55CA646F.8020506@gmx.de> <040101d0d4ca$656f4e20$304dea60$@belski.net> <55CC80FC.5070306@gmx.de> <066a01d0d61f$4937d370$dba77a50$@belski.net> <036401d0dc51$23f45060$6bdcf120$@belski.net> <55D79858.8080506@gmx.de> <04ac01d0dcea$386a6860$a93f3920$@belski.net> <55D8A957.7070703@gmx.de> <04da01d0dd0f$cba23e80$62e6bb80$@belski.net> Cc: 'Adam Harvey' , 'PHP internals' Message-ID: <55D9DF40.1020408@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:57:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <04da01d0dd0f$cba23e80$62e6bb80$@belski.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:KSspUc1bKTWmfLxUzJxJ797qv/43jD8qSZzkvAu3G/aiuCV2iYw xJc3KApyLm79YwzjTlW+dk+Wi5fo8xJos+n1Q0qPZxagI9Rne34axahbFk0KDtkhl1wIXLj 4+Ve+JlJJyVNQsl14MI03y6gEoi/1XdfqAjaeag6Gko+9HgFKABi0pcrkRn75sP7TbYm5OU g3h19e8TZgmydxcFGmqAw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:E29dgb+siCs=:kDUaXVls0BxOnfan4f+7Mo BzkkriD0tY8ATGVOVqq4ECwZK8qu01cVhqDdv9oWfbqDc4P1/dyjIS4+h98UrwBnk1R5EaQW6 aoQiwrVNmA9cQHLBIj9AhWhc4gvIogptlFXsKyH/8CMd2w+sHwmNvVBmdR+2Anb9YZTRgUoC4 hSailV5hZ/IcaVCORwojD8+x1moRpprYmESF3t4TtYHKMuFbFZJqK31aV4u0nXbsyNmVE++q+ 0jQdpTuIJvooBDcw3CvSuiAo66XWRQ65BOY2noZMkPEohjwyM/ltu2sFwUTWPCFoEOAVJYM6m o+s+xpSbfXORsuSYVhXkbFPHCWFoAU0ZI0wU2QYpt+BmxFOQ34mHkuLp04ZwRXQS7TKh2MyFM Br6gihYv0pfgSq2zlS5Q42G0X1QW3/cL994zcyVHOnodCGPJIcpJWokSbS6kncz06sZVXiupO Xm2uUNzfdcIuk+cjiSjIJvT5eXiS1xuTNWf4zh1A//9YwHpJ+OUHeWeCgcFJ5coWvpvnRMMkp LS/D8lw4R48fdImA3lghW5o1FU3jR8MuGuIogKZ4o5d9IiVwUAm/KdwXu37QvEtpsfE/R/QTP sHGn78MkHfLz/UhrnXthBAWsIAcs/mJe/WaELliPf9bdQZC6yQoppZcxErhoDBFm/GmBwCMGb 4I3/z+8XMnZa+fN3Y6M0Z/ZZQ5GrQ2EhBfVrCAl5Yt6NBT2h7xc7Ye3UH0nWviqAqZWTsE5yB CGzuyC8UVE3fLKqlyaY9ZwWtehtAIGJPqwkuNA== Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libpcre version requirements From: cmbecker69@gmx.de (Christoph Becker) Hi Anatol, On 22.08.2015 at 21:21, Anatol Belski wrote: > Hi Christoph, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Christoph Becker [mailto:cmbecker69@gmx.de] >> Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2015 6:55 PM >> To: Anatol Belski ; 'Nikita Popov' >> >> Cc: 'Adam Harvey' ; 'PHP internals' >> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libpcre version requirements >> >> Hi Anatol, >> >> On 22.08.2015 at 16:52, Anatol Belski wrote: >> >>>> Would it be an acceptable compromise for everybody to stick with the >>>> current >>>> *requirements* for now, but to document[1] that PCRE >= 8.10 is >>>> *recommended* for PHP 5.6 and 7.0? >>>> >>> A documentation can never hurt. For the case the requirement wouldn't be >> changed, it's of course even better to have a doc line, IMHO. >> >> I've added the recommendation: >> . >> >> What do you mean by "doc line"? A note in UPGRADING? > > Nope, I meant exactly what you did :) Fine. Thanks. -- Christoph M. Becker