Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:87869 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 47803 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2015 19:21:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Aug 2015 19:21:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=anatol.php@belski.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=anatol.php@belski.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain belski.net from 85.214.73.107 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: anatol.php@belski.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.73.107 klapt.com Received: from [85.214.73.107] ([85.214.73.107:40335] helo=h1123647.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BE/30-42781-3DBC8D55 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 15:21:55 -0400 Received: by h1123647.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix, from userid 1006) id BEC4223D6299; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 21:21:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on h1123647.serverkompetenz.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from w530phpdev (pD9FE8C65.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.254.140.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1123647.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B41723D6003; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 21:21:50 +0200 (CEST) To: "'Christoph Becker'" , "'Nikita Popov'" Cc: "'Adam Harvey'" , "'PHP internals'" References: <55CA26DF.3030109@gmx.de> <03dd01d0d476$c75b6730$56123590$@belski.net> <55CA646F.8020506@gmx.de> <040101d0d4ca$656f4e20$304dea60$@belski.net> <55CC80FC.5070306@gmx.de> <066a01d0d61f$4937d370$dba77a50$@belski.net> <036401d0dc51$23f45060$6bdcf120$@belski.net> <55D79858.8080506@gmx.de> <04ac01d0dcea$386a6860$a93f3920$@belski.net> <55D8A957.7070703@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <55D8A957.7070703@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 21:21:46 +0200 Message-ID: <04da01d0dd0f$cba23e80$62e6bb80$@belski.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQH7++SmR5Qqa5F1jGgVRfCNseMOmgMakR6SAY8BXI8BLOfZNwFYh0tDAgjcCuECSonbqgI9gLOFAT/6D6UCYLLr5wHp7MQ1AdPWwxydGS6UIA== Content-Language: en-us Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] libpcre version requirements From: anatol.php@belski.net ("Anatol Belski") Hi Christoph, > -----Original Message----- > From: Christoph Becker [mailto:cmbecker69@gmx.de] > Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2015 6:55 PM > To: Anatol Belski ; 'Nikita Popov' > > Cc: 'Adam Harvey' ; 'PHP internals' = > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libpcre version requirements >=20 > Hi Anatol, >=20 > On 22.08.2015 at 16:52, Anatol Belski wrote: >=20 > >> Would it be an acceptable compromise for everybody to stick with = the > >> current > >> *requirements* for now, but to document[1] that PCRE >=3D 8.10 is > >> *recommended* for PHP 5.6 and 7.0? > >> > > A documentation can never hurt. For the case the requirement = wouldn't be > changed, it's of course even better to have a doc line, IMHO. >=20 > I've added the recommendation: > . >=20 > What do you mean by "doc line"? A note in UPGRADING? >=20 Nope, I meant exactly what you did :) Thanks Anatol