Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:87867
Return-Path: <cmbecker69@gmx.de>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 38100 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2015 16:54:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 22 Aug 2015 16:54:45 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.17.20 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de
X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.17.20 mout.gmx.net  
Received: from [212.227.17.20] ([212.227.17.20:61921] helo=mout.gmx.net)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 57/F2-06657-459A8D55 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:54:44 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([88.134.66.33]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LsD9n-1YkocM2wP9-013tUw; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 18:54:37
 +0200
To: Anatol Belski <anatol.php@belski.net>,
 'Nikita Popov' <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
References: <55CA26DF.3030109@gmx.de>
 <03dd01d0d476$c75b6730$56123590$@belski.net> <55CA646F.8020506@gmx.de>
 <040101d0d4ca$656f4e20$304dea60$@belski.net> <55CC80FC.5070306@gmx.de>
 <CADajX4CcuDJLQtEjcS+-O_Dr9yYerRe4M=hyn1oP_Bggifmp8A@mail.gmail.com>
 <066a01d0d61f$4937d370$dba77a50$@belski.net>
 <CAF+90c-KkntMjB9H+zm87XqY24-zqWHmP_mLF00qm-pMqaxkWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <036401d0dc51$23f45060$6bdcf120$@belski.net> <55D79858.8080506@gmx.de>
 <04ac01d0dcea$386a6860$a93f3920$@belski.net>
Cc: 'Adam Harvey' <aharvey@php.net>, 'PHP internals' <internals@lists.php.net>
Message-ID: <55D8A957.7070703@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 18:54:47 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <04ac01d0dcea$386a6860$a93f3920$@belski.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID:  V03:K0:O4yDH/Phuj49VYWF0oXCfjZACnZRiiRbiiIImF0gbWZ13eqH16W
 90mCMJvyvMPgn8YOyyb5FDiLFPGzb3JOQ4FxzbjIGsfE4yI+yyncWvoqu9VwFaBxkdCOFx1
 wRvlQw0xhs7mq62gASpKQX8TJdPpsrcYRtSnlaI14mxZKVxY6C6oZwXAz6H9UKVf/jOJkd0
 eT0TN6TjESyGQGNuiWbdQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:+rrQR+KL5NM=:zS9yi+TBnbDoADWIm8oplY
 kRMS8/KLO1k9KU9Iaci+TebgfB0IaoNCzeIMCihQ9czppWo7v2kZbSs3TsBuifluLyzOTILpX
 7aloq/Sg+bgvEzwtWVJ9GfPqS1HP+8BNgYUr3vHgMLg0h93gF8/aDfl8yBfnQ+di8/wClONVG
 7qLsTosgOS/6IA78sc8e5d6BFGlHiJgqudsLpXA9HdqIRE8L0UBiU1d/IuRaU02vr3v2HeooB
 cu3tc/GDj7En1OA5zlyvNPsVj/uB39+93kzyu6tBkimSaan9Hs5eEsTugEjlVIT0kc4YPdSeZ
 MlJJeOWilK28B1dosUw7zPutbtlw+WMRbEwZykSAq5lABrX0GFlT6VJbFqHxPPYHSwy9ZX6Pl
 JUtVp8G613HdDHf/YwccjB+Z2bg9NkMbMgcsMIKNFZEmqjrBmKutCJCTPjA8nIB1ZWAdy5GmS
 ovjdc5Xpl4NP0264LcUd9kJQa9MxgzduJ4yhhlgOBvJHw/+T1SY+kcdLbEoBIf5xT2FRoDI7s
 0pHfH9lmA+qdLJYnfjRo5ThESjqiHwiCIofSLusiyXRqPaJ7CT70VmcLmXh5h+lFs8Lr96rSU
 qLlAPfDSI2q5ajKoJ58eptKPpLuB31qkTn59A5WOYzTuozwdi0GXgN5yFpBSJgLzxXjiv7U07
 aU6v3cWt3MaTy+QZmPTsLiQBw6du6cpKM2x5eNu0SJ3+cM1M5WUPB/UqNZ0YZyx0Hh8ZHUNdA
 LJECqbuGM8eynprkiB2LE5aYAx+YSHIRYd+vJw==
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libpcre version requirements
From: cmbecker69@gmx.de (Christoph Becker)

Hi Anatol,

On 22.08.2015 at 16:52, Anatol Belski wrote:

>> Would it be an acceptable compromise for everybody to stick with the current
>> *requirements* for now, but to document[1] that PCRE >= 8.10 is
>> *recommended* for PHP 5.6 and 7.0?
>>
> A documentation can never hurt. For the case the requirement wouldn't be changed, it's of course even better to have a doc line, IMHO.

I've added the recommendation:
<https://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=337590>.

What do you mean by "doc line"?  A note in UPGRADING?

-- 
Christoph M. Becker