Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:87839
Return-Path: <cmbecker69@gmx.de>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 43152 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2015 14:22:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 21 Aug 2015 14:22:47 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.17.21 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de
X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.17.21 mout.gmx.net  
Received: from [212.227.17.21] ([212.227.17.21:59299] helo=mout.gmx.net)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 05/73-03456-23437D55 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:22:43 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([88.134.66.33]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MexlN-1Z8mSO3PXF-00OUk2; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:22:33
 +0200
X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.php.net:119
To: internals@lists.php.net, pajoye@php.net, remi@php.net
Message-ID: <55D73431.8000908@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:22:41 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID:  V03:K0:eHh+cHCmolqJxF2ijejmYYiRxkwku5BiGirlPIU4dkPtnIf82CS
 XS59VX/VztCKDMvPOlDyoSFowSsGGNDy7hb4uVhmYMKBsD66F+CHs5Iugnoq/2G5q6oaeis
 pdyHqE7BroKJziUhI20sY7lPQ4FAqgz5cnAKF/AR2I/ciogvXPz91L2zX4pWMJ/zOXinXYE
 o+pu1son5V2kOK9SaF3zg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:TiuAocZdVBU=:rPy+GK3tPVJ8rKX3h0oDzr
 bxStXEl+fFEgmZO6uFHA14cyKQ5byhpYDqKUTqWd9yJxdWfn/6sVAXgfDMrNmPAqip1HPVC14
 30tW48GGMuRYrHW/8/lrwTnYQ8aMfbFqJUZ/174SkkrzGp7lMnfdFI21pMc7P2USfFfzwoFcs
 kvDV5tTjSquR97Uhec8yo+ebX1hymC0qnBfBNYBUd/Smmul5UjH5lvSGophIcr8HIZilh0nOn
 L8v1RdPklnmfgEX+iVCKyvmuV7tGeEtYWqfLV6DJpf9iRUqFBKaKR9e5EYmwVKTrGPyNvLEgS
 QMWaG1aflG6YaAQHEh5iuOHEi2zsGfVuhCf/4PHJWlWbnuFEiSAa0Wog8RIvzxdLUmg0CjFBR
 0dxjpXng9Vz3h/Oo+NPIappgtiIyCui+FCUT7KvrZ32mZOdtBKJLFleO1EZw/T10wJJPfwR01
 eIw6YzTWcIc+O6O45mk+uCGtxxjX0zJUKxmrQE8tVymTVjH4b5wp+VxvsFWENH8YOiIbR067z
 cD9Dw57iN0X387vWKbBpEtdf6xQ99jOo8LYI9D1prDzQJhmV8Dzti3m3Y+hgYUORhahs63Enf
 ZcY2jnKFxKdNuLX1Ar1yr6XaJhYQXOoxH2A9B53ikmwTIkOlHJZVt1qU3dJd5sCzawR0DiAFB
 435hQyREZe4xuTNFTaXbrAqq0L+q0ZX/cpLKzPDZk04DgRi/Y/9+Z5oZuStPsCJ9dHjsb193Y
 WsWFKh5HWrj5LrpUiPcfQqb16ZUkDvlkG2io7w==
Subject: ext/zip vs. pecl/zip
From: cmbecker69@gmx.de (Christoph Becker)

Hi!

How should development and maintenance of the zip extension be handled?
 Which is the "master" repo?

It seems that ext/zip and pecl/zip already have diverged, and IMHO it
would be reasonable to keep both repos in sync (or maybe to drop pecl/zip).

-- 
Christoph M. Becker