Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:87617 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 78097 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2015 17:18:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Aug 2015 17:18:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=scott@paragonie.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=scott@paragonie.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain paragonie.com from 209.85.192.53 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: scott@paragonie.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.53 mail-qg0-f53.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.53] ([209.85.192.53:36343] helo=mail-qg0-f53.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 45/00-11835-4F3F0C55 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 13:18:45 -0400 Received: by qgeh16 with SMTP id h16so11440846qge.3 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 10:18:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TTslV+QGcrfDZiCDivjnoiKbuAbEbuplaaATYo1z0n8=; b=Qe/ijU3SfNer8ATqDwu1AOoWGCw1Ta8oOPdQenHzE5TzCM1ozVhn8RAf8UWEtCI6Zr NGKpiNro9qXbHOzsw++15Zw34SkKIxID1x6lME4gmcIiuebnjFsZzszj+fUJPK2ZVI9C uhdMMKMsk/NDmIXAa3BUwkQ6aOJhR9PRQwzfESj1wOwJWCifwBjOqF7zHcGRtlckYCxt AL8XWRXsaeSnoHtkKqxMHsQZrYtQomHVpFuoFt9zsrM/byo9zemQMT5flA8aUj3oWEpv /1HuiGXIiGehXxbvZM6qx20QTpvKz8cCnb2o3XXvo8WvHC9GVcekdL1LsOgWS7b59brK YFGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnve5/6DmlvNX7/1LAYX8u+tQy+Cqg0UsyqaG9f0jo4wUbvRtzCpzU5PnoVQMQDH2J1DyHo MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.39.133 with SMTP id v5mr8526886qgv.34.1438708721719; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 10:18:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.83.102 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:18:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <41.B2.09373.B881EB55@pb1.pair.com> <1438641454.18995.10.camel@kuechenschabe> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 13:18:41 -0400 Message-ID: To: Ferenc Kovacs Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Move internals discussion to a better medium From: scott@paragonie.com (Scott Arciszewski) On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Terry Cullen wrote: > >> On Tuesday, 4 August 2015, Johannes Schl=C3=BCter >> wrote: >> >> > On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 17:15 -0500, Stephen Coakley wrote: >> > > You have to admit, NNTP news is an aging technology, with fewer and >> > > fewer readers available as time goes on. Nowadays (for graphical >> > > clients), there's Pan, and Thunderbird, and...? I use Thunderbird at >> the >> > > moment, because I didn't want to fill up my email, and there aren't = too >> > > many readers. Heck, Thunderbird is technically a "discontinued" >> product. >> > >> > ... and with a forum there is only a single client. The forum >> > itself. ;-) >> > >> > SCNR, >> > johannes >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> > >> > >> Redmine would be a good option. http://www.redmine.org/ >> >> The feature list has most everything covered in this thread. >> http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/Features >> >> >> >> -- >> > > > hi, > > maybe it just me, but it seems to me, that every time this idea is brough= t > up, not many people from the actual participants of the list speak up, bu= t > bunch of people who never before sent a mail to the list will chip in. > I'm not saying that there is nothing to improve, but I think that it woul= d > be important to actually incorporate some feedback from the people actual= ly > generating the content on the list. > personally I would prefer moving to something like google groups and doin= g > in a way that we can preserve archives ( > https://github.com/wojdyr/fityk/wiki/MigrationToGoogleGroups) > that would allow us to actually kill our ancient list/ezmlm infrastructur= e > along with news.php.net which would be a huge win. > it would also make it much more easier to search/link to our mailing list= s > archives: > news.php.net has no way of searching, news://news.php.net is pretty slow, > we have a couple of mail archives like > https://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/ which are indexing > some of our mailing lists, but they don't have the archives from the > beginings, but I remember seeing a mail from them to ask for our archives > in an mbox and they then would be able to add the missing indexes. > moving to google groups would also make it much easier to manage the grou= ps > (there are less people familiar with ezmlm administration than people wit= h > google groups experience) and make it easier to reply to old mails. > > I think that would suit our usage pattern better than a forum and > personally I don't really want to start hosting/maintaining one (we shoul= d > have to integrate our own auth and probably acl into that, security audit= , > keep it up-to-date, etc.). > > -- > Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs > @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu Not to pile in another voice from not a long-term participant, but here's my unsolicited $0.02 on this matter: Personally, I'd be fine with Google Groups. I recently set a few up for internal discussions (mostly to coordinate future blog posts for Paragon and brainstorm project ideas) and they're quite pleasant. One question (open for everyone, I don't necessarily expect Ferenc to know)= : Can we still archive messages on third-party sites (e.g. gmane.org/marc.info)? I've not delved into integration yet. Scott Arciszewski Chief Development Officer Paragon Initiative Enterprises