Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:87606 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 51859 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2015 13:12:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Aug 2015 13:12:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lauri.kentta@gmail.com; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lauri.kentta@gmail.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com does not designate 195.197.172.115 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lauri.kentta@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 195.197.172.115 gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi Received: from [195.197.172.115] ([195.197.172.115:46262] helo=gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5D/50-49831-B4AB0C55 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 09:12:43 -0400 Received: from tuikku (a91-154-97-11.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.154.97.11]) by gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116464003C; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:12:38 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([::1] helo=k-piste.dy.fi) by tuikku with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMc1G-0000JA-0Z; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 16:12:38 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 16:12:37 +0300 To: Scott Arciszewski Cc: PHP Internals In-Reply-To: References: <9996b5784a1bfbca80b07de01f1a7a94@k-piste.dy.fi> Message-ID: X-Sender: lauri.kentta@gmail.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 Cryptography Projects From: lauri.kentta@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauri_Kentt=C3=A4?=) On 2015-08-04 14:54, Scott Arciszewski wrote: > we do not allow secure modes I hope that was a typo... ;) On 2015-08-04 14:54, Scott Arciszewski wrote: > Version and configuration information (not what is passed, but what is > used) will be stored in the first few bytes of ciphertext output. Will this information be specific to the driver or to PCO, or is it possible to use other software for decryption? Will the API have a way to decrypt data based on that information (that is, without passing a DSN to the constructor)? How about producing a human-readable DSN of the relevant and/or all used settings to solve both of these cases? -- Lauri Kenttä