Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:87562 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 3561 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2015 08:40:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Aug 2015 08:40:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.214 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.214 mail4-2.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.214] ([217.147.176.214:43675] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A0/B2-22506-1F82FB55 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 04:40:18 -0400 Received: (qmail 734 invoked by uid 89); 3 Aug 2015 08:40:15 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 727, pid: 731, t: 0.0577s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52/d:10677 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.8?) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.157.58.188) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 3 Aug 2015 08:40:15 -0000 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <41.B2.09373.B881EB55@pb1.pair.com> <55BEAA53.3070201@lsces.co.uk> <3E.50.64118.B25BEB55@pb1.pair.com> Message-ID: <55BF28EE.10309@lsces.co.uk> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 09:40:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3E.50.64118.B25BEB55@pb1.pair.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Move internals discussion to a better medium From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 03/08/15 01:23, Stephen Coakley wrote: > I don't mean to sound rude, but when have you ever *needed* to access a > really old message while simultaneously not having Internet access? I > just can't imagine needing to do such a thing. Not saying it's wrong for > you to do so. When the local internet is down ... will be at least another three years before we get considered again for high speed broadband, but if I drag a cable across the nearby bypass I could plug into the next cabinet along I could get it. 3G is a joke I've been paying for for years and even Vodafone admit they have probably not provided me more than a days access in 10 years! But there are people out there far worse off than me for a broadband connection? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk