Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:87554 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 62169 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2015 23:40:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Aug 2015 23:40:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.214 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.214 mail4-2.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.214] ([217.147.176.214:38036] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 23/64-40707-95AAEB55 for ; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 19:40:09 -0400 Received: (qmail 26670 invoked by uid 89); 2 Aug 2015 23:40:05 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 26644, pid: 26664, t: 0.1262s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52/d:10677 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.8?) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.157.58.188) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 2 Aug 2015 23:40:05 -0000 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <41.B2.09373.B881EB55@pb1.pair.com> Message-ID: <55BEAA53.3070201@lsces.co.uk> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:40:03 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Move internals discussion to a better medium From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 02/08/15 23:41, Stephen Coakley wrote: > Thunderbird works great for reading nested replies and past archives, > but replying has about a 50% chance of success for me. Oh well. I'm up to 24Gb of history over some 20 years and despite attempts by some developers to mess it up, Thunderbird does the job reasonably well. I'd prefer to be back on Seamonkey, but that has lost the ability to handle so big an archive, and in trying to 'keep up' with Firefox and Thunderbird it's no longer providing what a single suite used to provide. But then my Linux desktop fills in the gaps so I don't need Thunderbird to have a bloody calendar or Firefox to muscle in on the same space. Thunderbird does reliably handle emails in and emails out without a problem, and I don't need to go on-line to read the traffic, ore scan the history ... -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk