Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:87509 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38402 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2015 13:25:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Aug 2015 13:25:17 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 78.52.11.62 f052011062.adsl.alicedsl.de Received: from [78.52.11.62] ([78.52.11.62:19082] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FE/53-09373-C3A1EB55 for ; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 09:25:16 -0400 Message-ID: To: internals@lists.php.net,Dor Tchizik Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 15:25:11 +0200 User-Agent: KNode/4.14.8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit References: Lines: 27 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Posted-By: 78.52.11.62 Subject: Re: Move internals discussion to a better medium From: markus@malkusch.de (Markus Malkusch) Dor Tchizik wrote: > malkusch: > >> What wrong with ? > > No threads, no searchability, no ability to respond. Try to use any decent newsreader and there you have everything you are missing. I do note that we also have a misunderstanding. I am not talking about that readonly webinterface http://news.php.net/php.internals. I am talking about the newsserver news://news.php.net/. You do notice the different URI scheme? > Also, disregarding the fact that GitHub going loco is not likely (because > there are other big players on the market) Even I do agree, I also didn't expect SourceForge going loko and they did. So nothing to learn from that? >> Let's reference something then > > I don't know how you see it, I got a mailto: link to that address. Yeah, probably I'm the only guy who is using this old technology. Sorry I'm from the last millenium. Well nowadays there's obviously only web. Markus Malkusch