Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:87240
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.172 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACwt+JfUVYaFrvsezFpU2=5tNBehLq9bGFQkSsoBgX5Vno663w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOsHV+uApxF=pQngonMppam2AEnW0Sm1ESAaB9exLH0K0hMBWA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXYx-MGjhHVkDRYsHSRR4b+x4ba5PVxdhw9W2B1z0fWCEQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOsHV+td_i5Z3JPmPF5WT8gAvhPFReO28L3TGPaYWgybSVnbSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXbgDcjXWgoDw_X61KDbeiV_tcHpGk5RFSFsnQ1-LSNVPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOsHV+tY4CmLD6tYt7R9eiNkBb9ibh4sjAVD0oysJTCuTY25Tw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXYtbhOg4XqniTtZj-rz-E7cc=C1cmqGSmphLmbN+cqASA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOsHV+vhvYD5JoyuKQOOmDzbN0rurGX58eMuRjn4cmH3H9gvsw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXa0=gZ=+5oSWp-kRBpWXoozHEdJb1-nuKN9r6RmGZj8Sw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOsHV+vjPxFZhN-OH8+5S57tK_P_G80B+HujXy07zeExOEMNVg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACwt+JdxCF=F-PzPtGsZJb0WapEzZk--Qb2CvMaowxr4m8-htw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOsHV+vbMteQhRHw7RKkp27BXEBaR+JzEns2CdngLwpEzMmpKA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACwt+JfUVYaFrvsezFpU2=5tNBehLq9bGFQkSsoBgX5Vno663w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 01:38:20 +0300
Message-ID: <CALW=WEDkJ0eUk3viUtgk-RG4D8w5THtcWa8DTgowT+WEmmPxKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick ALLAERT <patrickallaert@php.net>
Cc: marcio3w@gmail.com, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>, 
	PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Voting choice for language changes (Was: "Re:
 [PHP-DEV][RFC][DISCUSSION] Strict Argument Count")
From: ua.san.alex@gmail.com ("S.A.N")

I am satisfied, the possibility of group declarations, but the that lack:

<?php

use App\RestException\   // name "RestException", not imported to
current namespace :(
{
    Gone,
    NotFound,
    BadRequest
};

?>

Unfortunately have to write so:

<?php

use App\RestException;
use App\RestException\
{
    Gone,
    NotFound,
    BadRequest
};

?>

It looks ugly and very strange.
My proposition, the imported end name, if end of without slash.

Like this:

<?php

use App\RestException
{
    Gone,
    NotFound,
    BadRequest
};

echo RestException::class; // App\RestException

?>

2015-03-11 11:08 GMT+02:00 Patrick ALLAERT <patrickallaert@php.net>:
> Le mar. 10 mars 2015 =C3=A0 19:29, Marcio Almada <marcio.web2@gmail.com> =
a
> =C3=A9crit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2015-03-10 11:39 GMT-03:00 Patrick ALLAERT <patrickallaert@php.net>:
>>
>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Le ven. 6 mars 2015 =C3=A0 00:44, Marcio Almada <marcio.web2@gmail.com>=
 a
>>> =C3=A9crit :
>>>>
>>>> You are right about this. I'll setup a yes/no vote + a vote to decide
>>>> between E_WARNING (for consistency), E_DEPRECATED or E_STRICT. For me
>>>> this
>>>> is just a detail but maybe it's very important to others, so better to
>>>> let
>>>> each voter decide upon it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> In case of language changes, shouldn't the 2/3 of majority be required =
at
>>> any levels?
>>>
>>>
>> I don't think it's possible. What would happen if the yes/no vote passes
>> but the secondary vote doesn't reach 2/3 for some option? This would be =
a
>> weird situation.
>>
>
> Pretty simple actually: it would simply not pass because it wouldn't gath=
er
> enough support.
>
> Discuss the options, see what gather the most support and the better
> reasonings and then suggest that the RFC "yes" vote means A, B or C while
> summarizing the reasons of the choice for it in the RFC itself.
>
> A language change vote requiring 2/3 majority on a Yes/No and a simple
> majority in an option basically means not requiring 2/3 at all, but 50%
> (with 2 options) at most!