Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:86644
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAFMT4Nqn-C34LcFcrae10dpBDz6kwW21qtg=TQ_NM2i9sXSJhw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGa2bXaWaAVQq8re-hH5juQ5o-Rhnf5wJoZCa+1aW2yPK3uBrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFMT4Nqn-C34LcFcrae10dpBDz6kwW21qtg=TQ_NM2i9sXSJhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:51:18 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXaxQr4D_b1R=+s_c5ui4Pinm4roFq4bQRM1fYcYHzyabA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c07e992341a8a05188661a9
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Packed array is not fast?
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

--94eb2c07e992341a8a05188661a9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Levi,

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Levi Morrison <levim@php.net> wrote:

> How are you testing hash vs packed? As far as what you posted I cannot
> tell a difference =E2=80=93 it looks like you are running the same thing =
twice
> (same binary and same input file).
>

I've modified START index and verified both packed and unpacked array is
used
by using gdb. I didn't analyze whole execution, but only zend_hash.c

I didn't paste slightly different code because it will not give us much
difference
and it's useless services like 3v4l.

I'm a little disappointed by the result because I was expecting much better
result with packed array..

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

--94eb2c07e992341a8a05188661a9--