Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:86567 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54574 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2015 17:29:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jun 2015 17:29:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.15.18 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.15.18 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.15.18] ([212.227.15.18:60323] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9A/80-51179-4F378755 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 13:29:25 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([95.89.139.132]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MV6EP-1YX0RJ1wNB-00YOpH; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:29:12 +0200 Message-ID: <557873EB.5010306@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:29:15 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aaron Piotrowski , internals@lists.php.net References: <0402CFE2-0604-4C3F-A56E-42146B5031A2@icicle.io> In-Reply-To: <0402CFE2-0604-4C3F-A56E-42146B5031A2@icicle.io> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:t4OyT4asc4vXr8CuwabimMKYhslHjVPy809bPaFl0MtBeCfmzo2 k1Ykz/shYKg/Xb7gM8ZR2FcKpFDvV3jhESJNXITYVhYPSrl5oSivPkdADmhgGzKMkt0MLRJ 2rwSRXCsr1ZSdFd3l/p1Y7qGs2hrRDcedXNETtFUGXP+ZbOgR48DHEgpwnfvGOs2VsaOUBG AqeEcAdC8oNK0tS0oaRZA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Subject: Re: [VOTE] Throwable Interface From: cmbecker69@gmx.de (Christoph Becker) Aaron Piotrowski wrote: > Voting is now open on the Throwable Interface RFC: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/throwable-interface When will the voting end? It seems to be best to clearly state that in the RFC also. -- Christoph M. Becker