Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:86490 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 7487 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2015 21:55:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Jun 2015 21:55:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@golemon.com; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@golemon.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain golemon.com does not designate 209.85.192.49 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@golemon.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.49 mail-qg0-f49.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.49] ([209.85.192.49:35388] helo=mail-qg0-f49.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 60/02-19068-E59C0755 for ; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 17:55:44 -0400 Received: by qgh73 with SMTP id 73so8481960qgh.2 for ; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 14:55:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=m5rwUpzDVZdmetqm8csrXLU6QailcWbdRMr9gtlEfpg=; b=M+dASPwqimTCvKJHPpNzZ6Yn2+NriiDKRvnkdhMVN3XYjIOIkrFcAc+VDDEsutL2N+ XlEouxbjdQ/hwdBWqYPaYu85lSAL0KoPmnyJwrVMi/kJndSTK3Y1FrljEDe0u8TTnqz2 glAoAd1zW9XAZx0183JdXHAzJSGxw2DbeqhOazc2GBBuV8cEZVFJelySe1ZU2MbcwADH SP1q1dqK+bBdgE3ZUt/SCLYkTqtNpubsySkObd1mKDXq4EYm/gijqdOCSXXnRPdrAczx xPjph77YZaQq9pBkc0ER+b6CdGK3i82a8gT83KarzQGQfDzoce1cGrh9G3KoNt0lyRqc CSOg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnTvOZE0xAuznd4rLkt/pUubfRYIISex+0fmVQBi/bowHh8d09Qe5CukcUfClPR975UiiH5 X-Received: by 10.55.19.197 with SMTP id 66mr402359qkt.24.1433454939547; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 14:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.137] (c-73-189-247-124.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.189.247.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 197sm3053701qhq.23.2015.06.04.14.55.37 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jun 2015 14:55:38 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B466) In-Reply-To: <55708412.7090606@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 14:55:36 -0700 Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <556F80CF.40303@moonspot.net> <557013DF.9090708@mabe.berlin> <55708412.7090606@gmail.com> To: Rowan Collins Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Method call overhead From: php@golemon.com (Sara Golemon) > On Jun 4, 2015, at 10:00, Rowan Collins wrote: > : http://3v4l.org/l75kf >=20 > HHVM's percentages are lower primarily because its for loop measure is muc= h slower in absolute terms. >=20 At the risk of distracting from the central topic, I'd like to point out tha= t HHVM's times are almost certainly based on non-JITted code. The JIT doesn= 't kick in until the 11th request, and 3v4l scripts are, by definition, only= run once. PHP is optimized for blind interp, so it's doing better in that mode. -Sara=