Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:86488
Return-Path: <rowan.collins@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 93780 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2015 17:01:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 4 Jun 2015 17:01:19 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rowan.collins@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rowan.collins@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rowan.collins@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.172 mail-wi0-f172.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.212.172] ([209.85.212.172:36737] helo=mail-wi0-f172.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 59/A0-19068-E5480755 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 13:01:19 -0400
Received: by wibdq8 with SMTP id dq8so131435308wib.1
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 10:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=yrpglbCkUjKFVzB/gAV29Oi+CCDiEOose0mJARPAjSo=;
        b=X9ntfoH65NPcJd8MvySreiD3zFIBf27gPDCzsB0gv9xZY5DZJAn91jerIZ8vzpHjtH
         0yUo6gWihbh95vTHRyHmWTZWkzustXnVBgUnik2CnDTkTYUD8WCUv2kn+Pm7kezxUTju
         lGMqsgnKZjAb80Ml/fzDAGOOPvBfFFDUhcGsa2iBMFCt2iNGlm+B+bwckCTp18vzB7Lr
         mwPUiPW+Rv//fYN+IatqI+w0KlbTi/vyz/xbhBiiSxufqTk1IqAZjmHZruQzxeLgUHqu
         NmmJFrZnOLdVIc2dWUrqT9LfRk+EtrEsCkLbR8W71qya5nrxn/UjGPdD1H+0rLt23zcv
         NOdA==
X-Received: by 10.194.5.74 with SMTP id q10mr72465622wjq.27.1433437275797;
        Thu, 04 Jun 2015 10:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.159] ([62.189.198.114])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ul1sm6582354wjc.30.2015.06.04.10.01.14
        for <internals@lists.php.net>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Thu, 04 Jun 2015 10:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55708412.7090606@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 18:00:02 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <CAEYWF=4Gn=6OcPWc3w2k6G7DWrqaUfS4QdohjhiSG+2vH8euyg@mail.gmail.com> <556F80CF.40303@moonspot.net> <CAGa2bXakF6AAs5tMPjVV8hf3ZAx-nvu1uUViNsDSo-hAnetG2A@mail.gmail.com> <557013DF.9090708@mabe.berlin>
In-Reply-To: <557013DF.9090708@mabe.berlin>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Method call overhead
From: rowan.collins@gmail.com (Rowan Collins)

Marc Bennewitz wrote on 04/06/2015 10:01:
>> http://3v4l.org/eJK07
>>
>> See the total amount of execution time recorded.
>> If we really need pure execution time, then it should record "for loop"
>> execution time
>> with empty body.
> -> incl. displaying the time for the loop: http://3v4l.org/1vZJI 

Percentages relative to the base for loop, not previous item: 
http://3v4l.org/l75kf

HHVM's percentages are lower primarily because its for loop measure is 
much slower in absolute terms.