Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:86407
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_01BD5C9F-3CD6-4F58-82C9-F3B73A2D7278"
Message-ID: <539B6D5D-1EF4-478A-A1F0-E97BABBB7501@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 19:42:51 +0200
References: <3FCFEC72-64AD-42E3-8512-E3DACDE6FBD7@gmail.com> <CA+9eiLukBtLWHXLoi20aYQb71k5EtrmfH77V53gmteB6QZUMxg@mail.gmail.com> <052A15EB-E546-4FE3-9316-506931574948@gmail.com>
To: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <052A15EB-E546-4FE3-9316-506931574948@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC Proposal
From: tim.bezhashvyly@gmail.com (Tim Bezhashvyly)

--Apple-Mail=_01BD5C9F-3CD6-4F58-82C9-F3B73A2D7278
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8

Dear internals,

after cooling down and encouraged by Fran=C3=A7ois (thank a lot for =
this) I decided to submit an RFC regarding immutable variable only. =
Would appreciate if you will grant me some karma to do it.

Regards,
Tim

> On 18 Feb 2015, at 10:44, Tim Bezhashvyly <tim.bezhashvyly@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> Dear internals,
>=20
> my RFC was not about dropping just class constants but constants in =
general. Now I realise that you are not ready for this and most likely =
will never be. Thus I=E2=80=99m withdrawing my proposal.
>=20
> Regards,
> Tim
>=20
>> On 18 Feb 2015, at 06:59, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com =
<mailto:dmitry@zend.com>> wrote:
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Tim Bezhashvyly =
<tim.bezhashvyly@gmail.com <mailto:tim.bezhashvyly@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Dear PHP internals,
>>=20
>> this is my first RFC proposal and I am not sure if in this email is =
supposed to contain all RFC details or just a brief idea .. which is to =
drop PHP constants in favour of =E2=80=9Cfinal" immutable variables.
>>=20
>> I think dropping constant or class constants is a bad idea.
>> Adding immutable variables may make sense, but you should explain =
use-cases, behavior, syntax, implementation details, etc
>>=20
>> Thanks. Dmitry.
>> =20
>>=20
>> This is basically only a concept but I can also handle its =
implementation.
>>=20
>> Please let me know if I have to provide any additional details.
>>=20
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php =
<http://www.php.net/unsub.php>
>>=20
>>=20
>=20


--Apple-Mail=_01BD5C9F-3CD6-4F58-82C9-F3B73A2D7278--