Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:86308 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 58799 invoked from network); 19 May 2015 16:16:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 May 2015 16:16:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=morrison.levi@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=morrison.levi@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.176 mail-ig0-f176.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.176] ([209.85.213.176:36349] helo=mail-ig0-f176.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D2/5B-13816-3F16B555 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:16:51 -0400 Received: by igbpi8 with SMTP id pi8so79882936igb.1 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 09:16:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8UaCd/V80HzDB4oKxdGmkmIpvEmCSCMP1WMv+XuBFX4=; b=PSmseHkJCsRALBGSrLCzdP2U0e4Q28rmiJozcYHD+ZPOvTUjY9JJVt18CsYUm2Lb8N R4yFhxVH9/lFlp5+Nwhdp6IlLmiPOiy/hRuqcKp7MXKx2yK9ULcSFLvOAUWgrIO3QiBv 2Y936N64K6uITWyXNsBbV1Hn6/a3WxT5GcnD7yr/9TWR7+puM7zxHePkhKI8WpKZ0W/u o9kLIq5KXeH779RBF37dobDdeyI1lJjTKlTrAOXCP0BdiyKnrIVWtUJXxy7xPptdV/F8 Mln7/3/0T0zig9Sli5VBOlmQmcy7/LXGsuUCmegOzqaox4B17g+pkDNKntLRh2vLbyLr 3lNw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.39.9 with SMTP id l9mr6065884igk.45.1432052208568; Tue, 19 May 2015 09:16:48 -0700 (PDT) Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.98.67 with HTTP; Tue, 19 May 2015 09:16:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 10:16:48 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: GPmtPtHRM6zwNI0Nm9zhBWBXSUQ Message-ID: To: internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Soft-reserve "void" class name From: levim@php.net (Levi Morrison) I strongly disagree with this action. These types required an RFC; why should this be different? Also note that neither of the reserve typename RFC were unanimous. Furthermore, we are past the RFC stage. We are *supposed to already have an alpha* by now and we are proposing new changes?. Please stick to our established rules and release timetables as much as possible, thank you.