Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:8623 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98111 invoked by uid 1010); 19 Mar 2004 21:05:41 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98052 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2004 21:05:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.funio.com) (66.199.166.4) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2004 21:05:41 -0000 Recieved: (qmail 26341 invoked by uid 0); 19 Mar 2004 21:00:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.funio.com) (66.199.166.104) by 0 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2004 21:00:59 -0000 Received: from 66.158.132.127 (SquirrelMail authenticated user boulat@funio.com) by www.funio.com with HTTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:06:23 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <60763.66.158.132.127.1079730383.squirrel@www.funio.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:06:23 -0500 (EST) To: internals@lists.php.net User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] new security related directive for php-4.3.4 From: boulat@funio.com > On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 boulat@funio.com wrote: >> The reason why I would want to play with settings in php.ini or/and >> httpd.conf often is because everytime I modify those config files I MUST >> restart apache in order for changes to take place, meaning I will have >> DOWNTIME. Now imagine hundreds of new accounts added per day to your >> hosting machine, that means the webserver will end up getting restarted >> hundreds of times... Hundreds of seconds per day add up to minutes of >> downtime... and as we all know downtime is something everyone tries to >> avoid at all costs. > > That's a good point. But this implementation still doesn't seem very > slick to me. What about something like: > > open_basedir = /var/www/{user}/public_html That's a great way of doin it too, Rasmus. virtual_root_level might not be very slick, however, it was the simplest/easier way to solve the problem I was able to up with at the time. > Where {user} would map to the owner of the script being executed. Other > things that might be supported as well: {group}, {regex:a.*$}, {host} > and probably other things as well. I haven't thought through this very > much yet, but that seems like a more flexible approach to this problem. the beauty of open source... ;) Cheers, Boulat. > > -Rasmus >