Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:86169 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 27030 invoked from network); 12 May 2015 15:59:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 May 2015 15:59:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@golemon.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@golemon.com; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain golemon.com does not designate 209.85.215.49 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@golemon.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.49 mail-la0-f49.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.49] ([209.85.215.49:33645] helo=mail-la0-f49.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 78/C1-14268-27322555 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 11:59:47 -0400 Received: by layy10 with SMTP id y10so9469586lay.0 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 08:59:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qRGnDOyEsMJCJs3Lkh/iiVmEhCzJ5kwu5M8Bf9iJV/0=; b=Z2CUaWc5cEV2ZxNIo4RFFFElzLQQMz4Jj310tkT52p9zLwToQMFRB8msLcnx2OtM5x o2FZzx9II8i2rlhqkpiK7qJ+068LCTe3PINW54X5g3+KAfcVdxp6on5Ou2VvD4yWdeSN lq+Z7MvAPBmM7DmkSi00PItZSeHIdTjI0KclgivV2v9LhdlXJL578HWsHT4dDTzd43Oc +d95uAxtx+blSz5ILYHYMwZh7Ve66aq/DZ/BcwvIcE3hULd1ShGD3ikyEIhMEd58n5gH UA8108HJsjHU9Xn1N4F4MaQEzfKtf4EBXiJX/YeT92wQouLLkmaN8hdJQ+jcH1Mf2C0H De7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnxHy7FMyyY2MfC9tz8zMg5I7nYFd0YVj7pkaxkiSK+mM9P1fXFgdBUDjYS3jw41m385Kbw MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.150.100 with SMTP id uh4mr12344373lbb.112.1431446383666; Tue, 12 May 2015 08:59:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: php@golemon.com Received: by 10.112.11.134 with HTTP; Tue, 12 May 2015 08:59:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [2620:10d:c081:1110:8000::237c] In-Reply-To: References: <55513AA4.7010706@gmail.com> <579127CDC1B54040BEEFD4564A6F78B7@pc1> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 08:59:43 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: TVURCobXlUV3fnny8EKhTE94K4U Message-ID: To: Andi Gutmans Cc: Matt Wilmas , Stanislav Malyshev , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Undefined variables undefined order From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote: > I don't think it is worth the change. I actually prefer to leave code path > optimization up to gcc here vs. trying to tell it what to do. > This isn't about optimizing code paths, it's about changing undefined behavior into defined behavior. Either way the compiler is left to optimize and organize code according to its preferences. But whatever, this is so not something worth arguing over. If you like PHP being clowny in this minor edge case, I'm not going to get in your way. Cheers, -Sara