Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:86118 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67328 invoked from network); 5 May 2015 14:31:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 May 2015 14:31:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=anatol.php@belski.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=anatol.php@belski.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain belski.net from 85.214.73.107 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: anatol.php@belski.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.73.107 klapt.com Received: from [85.214.73.107] ([85.214.73.107:44146] helo=h1123647.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6E/B5-17212-034D8455 for ; Tue, 05 May 2015 10:31:14 -0400 Received: by h1123647.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix, from userid 33) id 1FF3E6D2035; Tue, 5 May 2015 16:31:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 217.254.139.158 (SquirrelMail authenticated user anatol@belski.net) by webmail.klapt.com with HTTP; Tue, 5 May 2015 16:31:09 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5548B234.9030907@opensides.be> References: <5548B234.9030907@opensides.be> Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 16:31:09 +0200 To: =?UTF-8?Q?=22C=C3=B4me_BERNIGAUD=22?= Cc: internals@lists.php.net User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.2 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Maintaining PHP =?UTF-8?Q?LDAP=C2=A0module?= From: anatol.php@belski.net ("Anatol Belski") Hi Come, On Tue, May 5, 2015 14:06, Côme BERNIGAUD wrote: > Hello, > > > I volonteered earlier to become a maintainer for the php-ldap module > as it seems unmaintained: > https://github.com/gophp7/gophp7-ext/wiki/extensions-catalog > I got no answer, I’m not sure what is the procedure for this kind of > things. > > Is there a special place to ask for this? > The php-ldap module needs some work and it would be sad for it to be left > unmaintained. > the patches in bug #61921 and bug #61853 was unfortunately not brought to the point. If you want to take over and make ext/ldap compatible with 2.4.x without usage of the deprecated symbols - that would be great. I guess the compatibility with ldap 2.3.x would still be useful. If you've decided to work on that, I'd be glad to support you with tests and reviews. I'd suggest for the start you to port those two ticket's patches to PHP7 and make the PRs, then we could test/improve it and see further. Thanks. Anatol