Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:86103
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOsHV+uYAmQ6940cGDD7=JRd_PVgMOyqppN3X1x0uckrMN=5DA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF+90c8nqCBGWpsqdfy+EKekOm3Cw5_zzE_nKeyLK5pzROTueg@mail.gmail.com>
	<54F07FC7.8050901@php.net>
	<54F0839C.3010700@seld.be>
	<55052FAD.6090608@php.net>
	<5505346D.7020700@php.net>
	<550DA4EE.2030903@php.net>
	<55410973.4010300@php.net>
	<55417C64.7000707@gmail.com>
	<5541B4D6.9060503@php.net>
	<CAMUwpuTQ7pypMGtVvG8Uc058a3EnqTry_ss6ovZMLzg=tHGoJQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<55425D7E.6010803@gmail.com>
	<CAOsHV+uYAmQ6940cGDD7=JRd_PVgMOyqppN3X1x0uckrMN=5DA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 12:08:49 +0700
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU6=pa3BkWwxPoUS5FS8-ooXWrz2jYPGyEZwks2sF8NFTg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcio Almada <marcio.web2@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, Sebastian Bergmann <sebastian@php.net>, 
	Julien Pauli <jpauli@php.net>, Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04426ca629bd410514fe35a0
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Exceptions in the engine
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--f46d04426ca629bd410514fe35a0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On May 1, 2015 1:24 AM, "Marcio Almada" <marcio.web2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Stas,
>
> 2015-04-30 13:51 GMT-03:00 Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > > We could make an exception (sic !) and add the Throwable interface to
> > PHP7,
> > > even after feature freeze, because it is an easy pick and having a
clear
> > > Exception model for 7.0 is to my opinion very important.
> >
> > I'm OK with it but I fear this is opening a can of worms, since people
> > will start arguing "well, we've added Throwable so let's also add this
> > other thing which is absolutely 100% necessary" and here goes our
> > feature freeze. Maybe I'm just too cynical :) Anyway, I don't have any
> > objection on substance to it. So if everybody is ok with it, I'm fine
> > with it too.
> > --
> > Stas Malyshev
> > smalyshev@gmail.com
> >
> > --
> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >
> I agree with you, but the process isn't perfect - and will never be.
Taking
> RFC guidelines without exceptions is damaging to quality in this case. If
> someone else decide to open a new RFC after the deadline without the same
> level of consensus we have here, the RFC will be put down, hopefully.

Let do a rfc to accept to post pone features freeze with a list or a single
RFC. I totally agree that this exact problem has to be fixed for 7.0, same
for error cb. I don't see anything else being so critical that it has to be
in 7.0.

My point for error cb is that it requires quite some changes in extensions
and if we like to avoid a 7.0 to 7.1 migration pain, it has to be in 7.0.

> Thanks.

--f46d04426ca629bd410514fe35a0--