Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:86018 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 74855 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2015 13:02:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Apr 2015 13:02:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 212.27.42.2 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.2 smtp2-g21.free.fr Received: from [212.27.42.2] ([212.27.42.2:30881] helo=smtp2-g21.free.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A4/24-38700-646D0455 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:02:01 -0400 Received: from moorea (unknown [82.240.16.115]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C294B0288; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:01:35 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: To: "'Ferenc Kovacs'" , "'Zeev Suraski'" Cc: "'Pierre Joye'" , "'Adam Harvey'" , "'Patrick ALLAERT'" , "'Olivier Garcia'" , "'PHP Internals'" , "'Kalle Sommer Nielsen'" References: <00a701d08266$ba37f990$2ea7ecb0$@php.net> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:01:53 +0200 Message-ID: <00ba01d0827c$aa9d5e60$ffd81b20$@php.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQGtul85J7vkVQXL6Xsh86B8+IHiHwIqg/z1ApIlUYsCD/FgWQKjY7arAjstY7wBzOUM9509vQrg Content-Language: fr X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150429-0, 29/04/2015), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Improved Error Callback Mechanism From: francois@php.net (=?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?=) > De : Ferenc Kovacs [mailto:tyra3l@gmail.com]=20 > > For PHP7 we had a previously voted on and accepted timeline = (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php7timeline) which stated marc 15 as > the last time for RFCs targetting php7, and as far as I can tell, = everybody seemed to agree that any RFC targetting PHP7 > has to be accepted before that date (I remember seeing people panic = about the scalar type hints voting being too late > and not being able to meet the deadline with the vote). > > I just now realized that this RFC was originally put under discussion = before the said deadline, so depending on what others think about > it I would be ok merging it considering that it is still a fairly low = risk change. Actually, it was slightly modified and everyone finally agreed that = March,15 was the date where the vote should have been started (and not = ended, as it was originally intended). This was mainly an artificial = way to add a small delay for scalar type hint RFCs. We never decided that an RFC whose discussion started before that date = could go to 7.0. There are a lot in this case (I personally have some) = and the consensus is clearly that they have *no way* to go to 7.0, = 'fairly low risk' or not. So, I'm strongly opposed to merging this = change in the 7.0 branch. Regards Fran=C3=A7ois