Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:85867 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 64204 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2015 12:41:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Apr 2015 12:41:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.17.22 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.17.22 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.17.22] ([212.227.17.22:56086] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 71/50-57547-772A3355 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:41:28 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([88.134.68.210]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M3d9B-1ZaGhO3kLB-00rF4h; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 14:41:23 +0200 Message-ID: <5533A275.7050303@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 14:41:25 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Malyshev , PHP Internals References: <54E35490.9040709@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54E35490.9040709@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:aTedQCx/TJbNEBz9wkDBz9JUIKuafr/A9lk06IoAgMmE8FVsp9i ms/bSX7r/UrdNXtz3TDf6F6dxbEHh74uiSQi262waod25dYEKFgUQckV18iapZ6fMweQPtd 9VI/GdM53eJrklL1Lag1reRz8OiTNoy3C0KQOFBHGwV6nNKHo15Y9GtnLpVW2NYkLwOvNZE TRHxf2jbtk4tq9OeHSpCw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Subject: Re: [RFC] Spaceship operator RFC From: cmbecker69@gmx.de (Christoph Becker) Hi! Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > As expected, spaceship operator RFC > (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/combined-comparison-operator) passed 43 votes > to 11. I'll proceed with merging it soon. A discrepancy between the actual behavior of the spaceship operator and an example given in its RFC has been reported recently (bug #69466[1]). To me it appears that there is a contradiction in the RFC (see my comment on the respective report), which would have to be resolved one way or another. [1] -- Christoph M. Becker