Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:85822 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 72445 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2015 11:52:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Apr 2015 11:52:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.169 mail-qk0-f169.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.169] ([209.85.220.169:35755] helo=mail-qk0-f169.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2D/10-05595-EF05E255 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 07:52:31 -0400 Received: by qkhg7 with SMTP id g7so78741326qkh.2 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 04:52:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gGiUaMI538slNHxlnzeYgJINWbDNHlupuShBJZH/a0o=; b=DsdFXgcw93nHfUz1obDpt4AlAqg6tyxCfWyWQD5afGGtiH/+qKGHYIoFXWG185H2xa gJjwUpU4AdOpV8dFWthaKnZmEii/VG/orBKXlltGzXG0/quzbCcJmUX39zBA0/VspDKf U3LXds3ZTkrDZGc4A6vFC1i3u8EqxwrXwq8iooYGDKGWupIbjCbRkgnN9hD1L55DdjOz BYCj/DcnViugBx7bT1Wd1rM/SkI8kJL08gYQPd6+fShV+VItJhlf2WgFwQgLFivkRGLS ps9Ita0sMcoAAbgBSA0paTWDOGYspp1kKZGmQGWB/uMQQYeIdLA0BrrjrlYmc7fNkszN 65QQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.22.222 with SMTP id 91mr50127893qkw.101.1429097280971; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 04:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.39.195 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 04:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.39.195 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 04:28:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <012601d0776b$8672a250$9357e6f0$@php.net> References: <012601d0776b$8672a250$9357e6f0$@php.net> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:28:00 +0700 Message-ID: To: francois@php.net Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11495724c829650513c1a37f Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Fixing bundled extension version mess From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) --001a11495724c829650513c1a37f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Apr 15, 2015 6:01 PM, "Fran=C3=A7ois Laupretre" wrote= : > > > De : Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com] > > > > What do you think to simply use the PHP version number instead of some > > outdated (most of the time) version for all bundled extensions? > > As the idea is that extensions available externally are supposed to change more often than the bundled version, why wouldn't we add a fourth number to their version ? By definition, version X.Y.Z.0 would correspond to the version distributed with PHP X.Y.Z. Again, if an extension is bundled and released outside, it should be updated to match the version used for the external release, same code base, same version. No need to over complicate it. > Also : > > - When we distribute the same extension code with PHP 5.4, 5.5, and 5.6, what is the version we set for this code in pecl ? Will we have to create 3 branches, just for versions ? > > - If a new PHP version is released, do we need to change the extension version even if the code was not modified ? > > Regards > > Fran=C3=A7ois > --001a11495724c829650513c1a37f--