Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:85781
Return-Path: <johannes@schlueters.de>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 57907 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2015 15:24:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 13 Apr 2015 15:24:10 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@schlueters.de; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@schlueters.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain schlueters.de from 217.114.215.10 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@schlueters.de
X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.215.10 mail.experimentalworks.net  
Received: from [217.114.215.10] ([217.114.215.10:60158] helo=mail.experimentalworks.net)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 7E/F1-41712-89FDB255 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:24:09 -0400
Received: by mail.experimentalworks.net (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id E91ED4A1AA; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:24:46 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
	km31408.keymachine.de
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,
	DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-HAM-Report: 
	*  2.4 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org
	* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
Received: from [192.168.2.34] (ppp-93-104-6-125.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.6.125])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: johannes@schlueters.de)
	by mail.experimentalworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07BE54A1A8;
	Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:24:41 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1428938604.3492.21.camel@kuechenschabe>
To: Johannes Ott <mail@deroetzi.de>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:23:24 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CB.90.41712.5B6CB255@pb1.pair.com>
References: <CB.90.41712.5B6CB255@pb1.pair.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-HrRemK24SWb6XEv7txYV"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] New RFC draft "static class constructor"
From: johannes@schlueters.de (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=)

--=-HrRemK24SWb6XEv7txYV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 15:37 +0200, Johannes Ott wrote:
> finally I managed to do my first RFC draft.
>=20
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/static_class_constructor
>=20
> I hope I have done everything correct so far and I'm looking forward to
> your feedback on it.

In my opinion this makes the language way more complex as there are more
places which "suddenly" execute code but solves a small problem compared
to that. (Which actually is an issue many people would suggest to avoid
completely instead of ennobling this with a language feature.

Why am I saying it makes the language more complex? - Your proposal
seems to miss mentioning when exactly the method is executed. what is
the output of


a.php:
<?php
echo 'A: '.__FILE__.':'.__LINE__."\n";
class A {
    static function __static() {
      echo __CLASS__.'::'.__METHOD__."\n";
    }
}
echo 'B: '.__FILE__.':'.__LINE__."\n";
class B {
    static function __static() {
      echo __CLASS__.'::'.__METHOD__."\n";
    }
}
echo 'C: '.__FILE__.':'.__LINE__."\n";
?>

b.php:
<?php
echo 'D: '.__FILE__.':'.__LINE__."\n";

C::$foo =3D 23;
echo 'E: '.__FILE__.':'.__LINE__."\n";

include 'a.php';
echo 'F: '.__FILE__.':'.__LINE__."\n";


class C {
    static $foo =3D 0;
    static function __static() {
      echo __CLASS__.'::'.__METHOD__."\n";
    }
}

echo 'G: '.__FILE__.':'.__LINE__."\n";

class D extends B {
    static function __static() {
      echo __CLASS__.'::'.__METHOD__."\n";
    }
}

echo 'H: '.__FILE__.':'.__LINE__."\n";
?>


Mind that in b.php we make use of class C above the declaration, which
we can do as C is a simple class and can be bound early during
compilation. Class D however can only be bound during run-time, after
including a.php, which happens after C was already used.

johannes


--=-HrRemK24SWb6XEv7txYV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAABAgAGBQJVK99wAAoJEH3sTmn8nIPXdJYIALO+paZ7033Wu9sCwzEsjM3u
Z+Uw3wmkHuzpuYwosCZZdD+R4i8gwMP8G6OmyCU46UsQ16F3nuMJy2/yeMF5kE47
v/u+uRbFuWAPGyKtt+XwcHjOTuQahRJ2vk5V5d7mr6WL8rW7Ilk9rUnW5FqIU7Th
7ZTydpsGs0kRW5d+IGHi/u4W8IRGOmBhcl197xf9UcjbginzyqnX5WG7kHqL8eRS
X6INY2vSYhk9CcfoKs5kL2MLNH9svY6TDZf6cMpJK0DEhpk6uWckQqQa2dqik0m6
vm4Glp6en+cOMe8/pP+E1j+e08MK8s8LxUG7CgJU7idIxHm8h171KSlpVjNMbec=
=GLZi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-HrRemK24SWb6XEv7txYV--