Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:85670 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82306 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2015 20:19:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Apr 2015 20:19:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rican7@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rican7@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.169 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rican7@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.169 mail-ig0-f169.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.169] ([209.85.213.169:38225] helo=mail-ig0-f169.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 68/FB-21906-9C25C155 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 15:19:21 -0500 Received: by igbqf9 with SMTP id qf9so56434597igb.1 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:19:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=pSA5UXRdv1QmPuJE0diuPTzXZ+/zmEjTZbAH7WDJeGA=; b=kI5XT5S239Px+JnZvJCaCg0092P4aGDAh3w0A078XoNv6BpOsQkBxcVDUUGwqzRq0D E/lvPbjKag5dUC2ftitPUsKZ3DhqQUVf+CcatbasBHAEyXWkf8hyv5pZAMiViRcZlj37 jAf7dm9FUo83Ve5cqELMcn2xdOAiE4Q8m2oiltPOePm8WXwwnG9o38sF5D1T7tt4yn1C vgkcpx0FYxFJ6IzFKbccannf8Jr1N4i3Bncjg81WGRXHpjsuXiyn10uW7jrAjmnYHtzp t2sicft7/t33umPM5FmSfQb62yK8gPD2fmuJEY5RfSdYyduW39Hrmv8LjhUeMEcRjobQ OvBw== X-Received: by 10.50.43.197 with SMTP id y5mr9029527igl.14.1427919559216; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:19:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <551BC7CF.3080309@birkholz.biz> <551C44C7.6060108@gmail.com> <551C48AC.3090908@birkholz.biz> <551C4A60.2050805@gmail.com> <551C5045.3010405@birkholz.biz> In-Reply-To: <551C5045.3010405@birkholz.biz> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 20:19:18 +0000 Message-ID: To: Dennis Birkholz , Stanislav Malyshev , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0118260818560c0512af6e8f Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] What's our official stance on small self-contained additions in a micro version From: rican7@gmail.com (Trevor Suarez) --089e0118260818560c0512af6e8f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Author of PR https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1145 here. I'm really quite sorry. I didn't mean to create a mess here. I was just trying to contribute. :/ Unfortunately, whether or not an RFC was necessary for an addition like this wasn't very clear. I'm an internals noob, so I simply tried to follow the flow of the addition of the similar method `DateTimeImmutable::createFromMutable()` that was added, without RFC (correct me if I'm wrong), in 5.6.0: http://php.net/manual/en/datetimeimmutable.createfrommutable.php Unfortunately, I'm not a huge fan of Derick's `createFromMutable()` method (why isn't there just a `createFromInstance()` or `copy()` method of some sort), but I tried to best follow the current design with my proposal and pull request. I think some clarification regarding what does or does-not require an RFC would make it much more helpful to contributors that want to help build PHP. Again, sorry if I caused any issue here. - Trevor On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:09 PM Dennis Birkholz wrote: > Hi, > > Am 01.04.2015 um 21:43 schrieb Stanislav Malyshev: > >> That is right and I think that is the reality we have to face: most > >> users use distro versions. They get a new version when they need to > >> upgrade their distro every few years. > > > > I'm not sure where you got this statistics from, but as I said, it is > > very easy to make .rpm or .deb with source version from php.net of the > > same minor. I've seen it done many times. It's next to impossible to > > make the same with different major, and nobody would do it for obvious > > stability concerns. I think the approach of "you have to wait several > > years for any tiny change" is terrible and detrimental for PHP > > development, however easy it makes the life of folks in Debian, etc. > > I vaguely remembered the usage statistics that Anthony assembled in > December and had other numbers in my head. (see > http://blog.ircmaxell.com/2014/12/php-install-statistics.html) > > 5.5.12 (Ubuntu 14.10): 0.16% > 5.5.9 (Ubuntu 14.04): 1.81% > 5.4.16 (CentOS 7.0): 0.42% > 5.4.4 (Debian Wheezy): 2.14% > 5.3.10 (Ubuntu 12.04): 4.13% > 5.3.3 (Debian Squeeze, Centos 6.6): 10.37% > 5.3.2 (Ubuntu 10.04): 1.06% > 5.1.6 (CentOS 5.11): 1.14% > ============================== > Debian, Ubuntu and CentOS: ~21,23% > > (I assume here like Anthony that the installs matching a distribution > specific version always come from that distribution). > > So I have to step a little back from my previous statement, only about > 1/5th of the installs seem to use distribution installs. But there are a > lot of used versions in between. Why they don't upgrade I don't know, > but if the upgrade would be a no-brainer without any risk for > incompatibility, probably more would upgrade, but that is just speculation. > > >> No, I don't say ban non-security bugfixes. But I say don't add new > >> methods/functionality that should go in the next feature release. > > > > I'm fine with adding only those that should go into the current one, > > namely small self-contained additions :) Just as we agreed on long ago. > > An addition and a bug fix are different things. > > Greets > Dennis > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --089e0118260818560c0512af6e8f--