Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:85583 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 21083 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2015 13:32:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Mar 2015 13:32:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 212.27.42.2 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.2 smtp2-g21.free.fr Received: from [212.27.42.2] ([212.27.42.2:54228] helo=smtp2-g21.free.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6A/20-19097-6E1AA155 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 08:32:24 -0500 Received: from moorea (unknown [82.240.16.115]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F3C4B029B; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:30:24 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: To: "'Zeev Suraski'" , "'PHP internals'" References: <3a939905cd5a06158c9e99d8af26e596@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3a939905cd5a06158c9e99d8af26e596@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:32:15 +0200 Message-ID: <029901d06bb7$1aaf07d0$500d1770$@php.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQHiNVLj++xbq2GcCuh4y/IfJMptu50TA0kw Content-Language: fr X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150331-0, 31/03/2015), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Naming of 'weak' type hints From: francois@php.net (=?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?=) > De : Zeev Suraski [mailto:zeev@zend.com] >=20 > One thing that I think we should change is how we refer to the = =E2=80=98weak=E2=80=99 type > hints. The word =E2=80=98weak=E2=80=99 has a negative ring to it, and = considering this is > how the language behaves across the board it=E2=80=99s a pretty bad = name for this > feature. What about 'loose' vs 'strict' type hinting ?