Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:85470 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92061 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2015 19:28:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Mar 2015 19:28:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.17.22 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.17.22 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.17.22] ([212.227.17.22:62024] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 38/F3-63185-55C03155 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:28:22 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([91.67.244.80]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lfppu-1ZGHfq14Vm-00pJ1u; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:28:12 +0100 Message-ID: <55130C52.70204@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:28:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net CC: pollita@php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:0rYrA3DJzbOvBmt7BV2MQRqcyAkU4aln49LgflcgEvoKMEYxjYR mx//e+S18WcsbrsxbiyKG0yfQiB5f+05yfwtI+bykxzPdRckUquQEONOG2WbJ3aFOmCnh1L aCeb2mTZJz3OzRM1W7ENMCxi1XqG5JM6phgHaEZnqju2fnzNyUfRXz4N2lenzG3ts8aQS0c 7QtPMQVrZm8aZ18nOOrcg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Subject: RFCs targeting PHP 5.7 From: cmbecker69@gmx.de (Christoph Becker) Hi everybody! In the Wiki there's a section with RFCs targeting PHP 5.7[1]. Obviously, this section should be merged into the PHP 7.0 section. I will do so, if there are no objections. However, the "Fix handling of custom session handler return values" RFC[2] still says "Status: Voting" even though the voting has ended, and the RFC has been accepted, and is listed as being implemented, but it seems the respective feature branch[3] has not been merged. [1] [2] [3] -- Christoph M. Becker