Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:85381
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.178 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <67EFB3DC-9F46-4FDE-B37E-A8642343D8B7@zend.com>
References: <000001d063ef$08af3ca0$1a0db5e0$@php.net>
	<550D96D0.7020406@lerdorf.com>
	<67EFB3DC-9F46-4FDE-B37E-A8642343D8B7@zend.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 04:44:23 +1100
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU4B7LAN63PiXoeFtwiU=zKVYw4SvzsKiSHLanL77-QDAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>, 
	"francois@php.net" <francois@php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c16dfcd8cf110511cffb32
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Proposal to delay 7.0 timeline
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--001a11c16dfcd8cf110511cffb32
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mar 21, 2015 11:55 PM, "Zeev Suraski" <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Sent from my mobile
>
> > On 21 =D7=91=D7=9E=D7=A8=D7=A5 2015, at 18:05, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@l=
erdorf.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/21/2015 08:52 AM, Fran=C3=A7ois Laupretre wrote:
> >> Now, after more calls from many of you to delay it, and as Zeev himsel=
f
> >> seemed to consider it as more acceptable, I am proposing again to
delay 7.0
> >> feature freeze to May, 15 (2 month delay, date where vote is
starting). I
> >> won=E2=80=99t repeat all the arguments of my previous posts but, to su=
mmarize,
it
> >> would allow to include important features, making it a =E2=80=98real=
=E2=80=99 major
version.
> >> Releasing a major version is not just a question of BC break, we also
need
> >> to think about what we put forward. So, we need features. We already
have
> >> STH, but we can do more (I personally have at least 4 RFCs I didn=E2=
=80=99t
have
> >> time for, including scalar pseudo-methods, which can be an important
> >> feature).
> >
> > No, please, let's get what we have stabilized and out the door. There
> > are always more things to do and we can delay things indefinitely. And =
I
> > completely disagree that this isn't a 'real' major version.
>
> +1

Same.

> Zeev

--001a11c16dfcd8cf110511cffb32--