Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:85146 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 96619 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2015 22:00:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Mar 2015 22:00:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.41 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.41 mail-la0-f41.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.41] ([209.85.215.41:33393] helo=mail-la0-f41.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 59/E7-56166-DE3A8055 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:00:14 -0500 Received: by ladw1 with SMTP id w1so20923338lad.0 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:00:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=BSLjHXbqjZWjpH1R3HHcbFL7NnR4m3VL7S09/5XEu7U=; b=kNidlemMEe96iE/g7cTrfzsogj9YhMr7B0QmXSCRdiyOXVyGlONNfPlDNPkH/32cj/ OwO+BNetYU08xt50svqyj6Q2GSwxUBWEUc8unQLxCmrEVywboRqhzX6D+8K9AXD4IAtR x+Mkdzm69Rz40tmvhLwlG5FjXUR14U1w2ITE1nE9R1XL91iJcju+l+S0wnjKDTUceijj fy/86l6tzG40vWXbKO/AxqBmV72ieLsy9/33knUjiuaqJYagpPKi198sX8ZfobwKRyMd F4t2ITnCfsUFYBWFf0eoWrbKOOewr3N8f3zqtOKdyliQ3/JOkJxJ+OlijRH81Zp3t5D2 a2Pg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.166.102 with SMTP id zf6mr57557514lbb.24.1426629610792; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:00:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.61.135 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:00:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:00:10 -0700 Message-ID: To: "Sebastian B.-Hagensen" Cc: Anthony Ferrara , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Voting irregularities From: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com (Hannes Magnusson) On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Sebastian B.-Hagensen wrote: > Hi, > > 2015-03-17 20:55 GMT+01:00 Hannes Magnusson : >> If you need to confirm the statistics, or gather more background data, >> then feel free to contact me privately, off the list, and I'll get you >> the account approval dates (karma and/or wiki). > > While I agree that the issue at hand was not presented in the way it > should have been may still become a valid issue in the future. > If you want to prevent situations or even (wrong) ideas and > accusations like these the dates of account creations have to be > public and easily accessible by everyone involved (publicly listed on > people.php.net for example). people.php.net are php.net karma holders. We have no responsibility to disclose any information about our contributors to anyone. It is however fun to do so, so I created people.php.net listing random info about our contributors. If you can think of other fun things to do with that website, I'd love feedback and contributions! The wiki account system is different. php.net karma holders have access out-of-the-box using their vcs credentials. Then there is a special case where you have to register to the wiki itself. Having a wiki account does nothing out-of-the-box. You have to ask for specific access. Since the inception of the wiki I have been the only one giving out wiki credentials. This has mostly been to outsiders wanting to write RFCs. I have vague memories having given 2-3 people access to https://wiki.php.net/usergroups and similar to docs and so on. These people still cannot vote. A person who maintains popular pecl extension cannot vote either, unless the extension is maintained on the php.net infrastructure (and therefore requiring php.net account) btw. There have been several members from the community that have asked for voting privileges, as per the voting rfc. I have arbitrary approved maybe 3 or 4 over the years. The other 5-10 did not get voting privileges because the authors of the voting rfc didn't care. I have absolutely no interest this voting business and and strongly disagree with the entire voting rfc idea. I would love to get back to http://producingoss.com/en/consensus-democracy.html Now. Please go on and become famous by blogging about conspiracy theories (I've got plenty if you are short of ideas!) or whatever tickles your fancy - but please don't be dragging this onto the list. -Hannes