Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:85104
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.173 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGa2bXbOKXWGEM=_2_mZxiVK8bdjAYNH-nyOKmGQ=tddKvcDVA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGa2bXaqxbSoy7SP0rnd5D4mKZCC1zDYJX8CvK_6DrA+zmo=oA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU7C3C14D9GwgY7QidaFC3CHjvc5fJY4CqnJU4jQaWD5WQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXbOKXWGEM=_2_mZxiVK8bdjAYNH-nyOKmGQ=tddKvcDVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:50:23 +1100
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU7BG=+9BzxXJnNXSRxXC2ELYRnYR5Ct5oQdA7=MCDEazA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c16dfcee6cfb05116fac24
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Introduce Type Affinity
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--001a11c16dfcee6cfb05116fac24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Mar 17, 2015 9:42 AM, "Yasuo Ohgaki" <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I very much appreciate your consistent effort to improve php, at all
levels.
>>
>> However I won't comment on this RFC or any further RFCs trying to target
7.
>>
>> My reasoning is that we should now focus on getting it out, in time. I
did not agree with the time plan about 7 development but it is what we
decided. Let get back to work now.
>
> I agree that we should concentrate for PHP7.0.
> The reason why I raised this topic is currently proposed "strict_types"
does not work
> well with this.
>
> If inputs are converted/validated as certain types with or without this
RFC, "strict_types"
> should raise error for mismatched types. However, current proposal does
not do this
> depending on how "strict_types" is used...

I do not see your point with strict type and what your RFC proposes is what
ext/filter does. I would really not to start again this kind of discussion
while trying to get 7 out in time as it is already quite a challenge.

--001a11c16dfcee6cfb05116fac24--