Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:85019
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.220.178 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMc0WS5MJ_RAtNO47R4wQjy8_YSDzzZeGECLUnzSVOAmB2JyPw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BLU436-SMTP234CAFED9639237DE430B18E2190@phx.gbl>
	<325E0097-FD7E-4997-A95D-20C62368E162@zend.com>
	<55031C54.6060802@eliw.com>
	<CAMc0WS5MJ_RAtNO47R4wQjy8_YSDzzZeGECLUnzSVOAmB2JyPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:55:01 +0300
Message-ID: <CA+9eiLsmbnQL8U9NxAFeYiE6UJL0BMT3QZVz160dhx2HYZ=1aw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stelian Mocanita <stelianm@php.net>
Cc: Eli <eli@eliw.com>, PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0115f048fed779051164d710
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types
From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov)

--089e0115f048fed779051164d710
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Stelian Mocanita <stelianm@php.net> wrote:

> So to get it clear for everyone: the right way is for internals to ignore
> community as a
> whole, stick to their own views and implement something nobody actually
> wants


Few people already told - they like this.

Thanks. Dmitry.


> - just
> because there is no time -  on the idea that "something is better than
> nothing"?
>
> Without pointing any fingers it sure looks like a stalling tactic where
> someone
> eventually gets what they want.
>
> Highly disappointed on this outcome.
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Eli <eli@eliw.com> wrote:
>
> > Not that another +1 is needed, but I'm with Andi here.  I do personally
> > like this 3rd proposal as an option, if nothing else because it
> > implements the 'simpler base'  at the moment, and allows us, once people
> > are used to this being part of the language, to continue to evolve
> > later.  And that evolution can be based upon our real world experience
> > of using this 'base level' of typehinting for a while.
> >
> > Versus the more complicated versions, of which both Zeev's and Anthony's
> > are.  In each their own way.
> >
> > Eli
> >
> > On 3/13/15 1:17 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> > > Agree and I would vote +1 on this even if I'd prefer coercive. It is a
> > > very valid option for a 7.0 and it is future proof.
> >
> > --
> > |   Eli White   |   http://eliw.com/   |   Twitter: EliW   |
> >
> >
> >
>

--089e0115f048fed779051164d710--