Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:85013 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 42315 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2015 09:16:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Mar 2015 09:16:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.214 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.214 mail4-2.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.214] ([217.147.176.214:50902] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0C/E7-00492-36F96055 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 04:16:20 -0500 Received: (qmail 9710 invoked by uid 89); 16 Mar 2015 09:16:17 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 9704, pid: 9707, t: 0.0640s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52/d:10677 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.8?) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@86.178.189.108) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 16 Mar 2015 09:16:17 -0000 Message-ID: <55069F60.5040006@lsces.co.uk> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:16:16 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <55068E88.3090401@lsces.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] In Operator From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 16/03/15 08:59, Leigh wrote: > And how do you propose the lexer/parser is extended in this manner? 'Some of this Syntactic sugar' ... Things like the sort interface and other userland stuff and there are tidy ways to do 'in' with existing code. Most of the time mine has already been run in the database. But I would also include PECL in the supporting tools camp, where adding or upgrading internal code sits perfectly if the reliance on a single bundled package is relaxed. How many people ACTUALLY use the official bundle. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk