Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:85003 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 18162 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2015 08:40:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Mar 2015 08:40:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@beccati.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@beccati.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain beccati.com designates 176.9.114.167 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@beccati.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 176.9.114.167 spritz.beccati.com Received: from [176.9.114.167] ([176.9.114.167:42291] helo=mail.beccati.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 99/92-00492-DE696055 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 03:40:14 -0500 Received: (qmail 11548 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2015 08:40:09 -0000 Received: from home.beccati.com (HELO ?192.168.1.202?) (88.149.176.119) by mail.beccati.com with SMTP; 16 Mar 2015 08:40:09 -0000 Message-ID: <550696E2.7080500@beccati.com> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:40:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leigh CC: Stanislav Malyshev , Sammy Kaye Powers , PHP Internals , Nikita Popov , =?UTF-8?B?UMOhZHJhaWMgQnJhZHk=?= References: <55055F1D.2020200@beccati.com> <55060E3A.4040509@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Vote open for reliable user-land CSPRNG From: php@beccati.com (Matteo Beccati) Hi, On 16/03/2015 00:25, Leigh wrote: > Indeed we would, it's the kind of issue that would get solved pretty > quickly (imho). Maybe it was an issue at some point in the past and > there's still misinformation out there? Who knows, it certainly isn't an > issue today. thanks everyone for the clarifications! They've been very useful, and not only in the context of the RFC at hand. Cheers -- Matteo Beccati Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/