Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84998 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4634 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2015 07:15:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Mar 2015 07:15:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mailing@pascal-martin.fr; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mailing@pascal-martin.fr; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain pascal-martin.fr designates 91.121.85.26 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mailing@pascal-martin.fr X-Host-Fingerprint: 91.121.85.26 ns362529.ip-91-121-85.eu Received: from [91.121.85.26] ([91.121.85.26:36162] helo=pascal-martin.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 66/90-00492-F0386055 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 02:15:27 -0500 Received: from [192.168.10.8] (teaebook.pck.nerim.net [213.41.140.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pascal-martin.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9D3DE03C5 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:15:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5506830D.3010000@pascal-martin.fr> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:15:25 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC VOTE] Generator Return Expressions From: mailing@pascal-martin.fr ("Pascal MARTIN, AFUP") Le 09/03/2015 17:50, Daniel Lowrey a écrit : > I'd like to announce voting for the Generator Return Expressions RFC: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/generator-return-expressions#vote Hi, After discussing this RFC with other people at AFUP, it seems we (even if not many of us did express themselves on this matter) are +1. Basically, adding one information that doesn't count in the iterator and acts as some kind of final value could be interesting. Thanks for your work! -- Pascal MARTIN, AFUP - French UG http://php-internals.afup.org/