Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84962
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c8fkaDu+xiCdQ2F6+MXMSyzvPkDcRjXCCs5YtEqpzsmZA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF+90c8fkaDu+xiCdQ2F6+MXMSyzvPkDcRjXCCs5YtEqpzsmZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:34:40 +1100
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU5AhfHrriH-2=mKmx+J3yXMWNT5wQOpmeMY6whvvkL09w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Reclassify E_STRICT notices
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

hi Nikita,

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi internals!
>
> To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes...
>
>     https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote
>
> Voting is open for ten days :)

I am late on that but I need one clarification about:

"Some of the strict standards notices are converted to an error
category that is considered more severe. As such error handlers might
treat it more severely, resulting in BC breakage."

Does it mean that some errors may end on recoverable error? Aka, an
actual break, or simply a higher error level, a warning in the worst
case?

If it is the sooner, only for few cases, then I will vote no as I
think it is not a good move. If the latter, I am all in.

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org