Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84941 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85655 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2015 22:12:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Mar 2015 22:12:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=listas@rafaeldohms.com.br; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=listas@rafaeldohms.com.br; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain rafaeldohms.com.br from 209.85.223.170 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: listas@rafaeldohms.com.br X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.223.170 mail-ie0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.223.170] ([209.85.223.170:35469] helo=mail-ie0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 73/B2-06614-DC306055 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 17:12:29 -0500 Received: by ieclw3 with SMTP id lw3so157331652iec.2 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 15:12:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2ZWjqByeGtey2+yUZ4oplBdbY1j9glTwvjf06EBDZcw=; b=ULPWqe5SXZHrc7Xs7Znmqhy4T5H35RJSm6yuEtvjOFEnPIGo4Te+ZMpq+TDUe7KKAy Kp6Fx5JQOERgyhyoauGX1Fsiiu43avV6RqCTQ/wbHCC7hVvU1xlGr2OoBXS+l5xRqb6L 6fYJUKgiSPdifTODBhJSo5YVcpkpvTUQMUXHjrrwp12Zhuj+nY68Rwx8v+bS054ecpye Vmw/kYrCnIBzMzGXG2BTyXFFTJ7IatsA6qIw6FZhj3EBtK1yovC19gYSVrhkd5Vq5jSX J/J3ProugvQNZLvbjXbly+3/wtD+hCEcVe2/EhVm+91MfImK86+rW/qb85ysxST2mglU C43A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlrZ9Z07ANEWif0GSi3JKlDmJRIEGx6D8q48n7HvUU5dWgmAZE8LcgrBvS4y0fx26FiusI5 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.66.235 with SMTP id i11mr104616648igt.40.1426457546142; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 15:12:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.15.135 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 15:12:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <029b2f17a85e1bc03504d82772de1f26@mail.gmail.com> References: <6e268626bc6b84a3886f39442c827bb6@mail.gmail.com> <9cc36c9a8c15ba411a8f2981ff18678c@mail.gmail.com> <556399ae939b3e947381b1c50db2de6b@mail.gmail.com> <029b2f17a85e1bc03504d82772de1f26@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 23:12:25 +0100 Message-ID: To: Zeev Suraski Cc: Philip Sturgeon , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6be0a53642405115b0757 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [INFO] Basic Scalar Types From: listas@rafaeldohms.com.br (Rafael Dohms) --047d7bd6be0a53642405115b0757 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > > I asked whether there was anything in the Voting RFC > (wiki.php.net/rfc/voting) or the Timeline RFC > (wiki.php.net/rfc/php7timeline), the two RFCs being used to block a Basic > STH poll from going to a vote for PHP 7.0, that somehow make it legitimate > for it to be proposed if the Dual Mode RFC fails. > > The answer - there's not. > > I may be missing something, but isn't the reason why its not going up for vote that it has not gone through the RFC process yet? 2 weeks here, 2 weeks there and such? Honest question, please don't take it off-tone. -- Rafael Dohms PHP Evangelist and Community Leader http://doh.ms http://www.amsterdamphp.nl --047d7bd6be0a53642405115b0757--