Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84918
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ad9f741052c0682e46b56fb81da04f7b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ad9f741052c0682e46b56fb81da04f7b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:21:32 +1100
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU5masYvTVFwLREbNz07z1OSU=G8M52w5GQUmaJgg-rkxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1136fdce63524b05115a5130
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Basic STH - status & unofficial poll
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--001a1136fdce63524b05115a5130
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mar 16, 2015 8:03 AM, "Zeev Suraski" <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>
> All,
>
>
>
> First, I decided not to propose Basic STH under my name, despite the fact
I
> think that not committing to put it to a vote adds unneeded risk for
> delivering STH in PHP 7.0.  Whether or not it=E2=80=99s put to a vote wil=
l be up
to
> Bob.

It is not up to any of us. If it is too late and as far as I remember it
is, then it is over for any new rfc.

> Secondly, I do want to attempt to understand what will happen if & when
the
> Basic STH RFC goes to a vote at some later point in the future (which
> according to Bob, will happen if the Dual Mode RFC fails).  If I see that
> Basic STH is going to fail, I=E2=80=99ll change my vote to be in favor of=
 the Dual
> Mode STH RFC,  call upon everyone to do the same, and retract my Coercive
> mode RFC.

Then do it now. Accept that your RFC failed and stop trying yet another
move to get it. This is really killing us.

>
> This unofficial-non-RFC poll is here:
wiki.php.net/notrfc/scalar_type_hints
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Zeev

--001a1136fdce63524b05115a5130--