Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84915 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 42072 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2015 21:11:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Mar 2015 21:11:19 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 93.205.247.108 p5DCDF76C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de Received: from [93.205.247.108] ([93.205.247.108:16795] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0E/39-31306-575F5055 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:11:18 -0500 To: internals@lists.php.net,Crypto Compress Message-ID: <5505F571.3040604@deroetzi.de> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 22:11:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6D.2C.32765.10EC0055@pb1.pair.com> <5500D967.5040800@gmail.com> <13.69.64353.73451055@pb1.pair.com> <5501876C.3020107@gmail.com> <3D.85.42021.3E7A1055@pb1.pair.com> <5501B77D.5010800@gmail.com> <85.D1.24603.247C1055@pb1.pair.com> <5501D328.9040800@gmail.com> <98.26.24603.C9DE1055@pb1.pair.com> <5501F823.3060805@gmail.com> <55028793.5040606@googlemail.com> <04.FE.24603.D5CB2055@pb1.pair.com> <5503D9E8.1090008@googlemail.com> <57.60.52108.BE854055@pb1.pair.com> <5504712D.4010103@googlemail.com> <55049B17.2060000@deroetzi.de> <550558AB.9010402@googlemail.com> <55056E7F.5050209@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <55056E7F.5050209@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 93.205.247.108 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] static constructor From: mail@deroetzi.de (Johannes Ott) Am 15.03.2015 um 12:35 schrieb Crypto Compress: > You should reread your mails and keep insults to yourself: > >> as already discussed several times > >> ppl, who doesn't understand > >> some beginner who is doing such horiffic code > >> maybe think more about what he is doing > >> doing 15 years of OOP-programming > >> I never had the need > >> "valid" usage > >> as I explained > >> direct static binding > >> PHP is as intelligent > > Bye! Hi Crypto Compress, Sorry those shouldn't be any kind of insult! If you understand those as an insult I really apologize for that! Maybe I was a bit to hard at argue. Nothing else was my intention, then a discussion about the arguments. And when writing about beginner ppl doing horrific code I didn't meant it personaly to someone special, I'll just tried to take count about Rowans argument, that beginners will have extremly problems with this static context. > And PHP is as intelligent, I really think PHP is a very smart language already and I tried to implicit, that it is working already correctly on the problem you have told. As a conclusion I will reread my mails in future, and try to improve my sometime really poor English, and think about everything twice, to avoid more misunderstandings on my argues Sorry again! -- DerOetzi -- DerOetzi