Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84914
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.54 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: stelian.mocanita@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <ad9f741052c0682e46b56fb81da04f7b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ad9f741052c0682e46b56fb81da04f7b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 22:11:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMc0WS4qVmD5_sdiDLsGm0P6Pd+W2QQgWyfYUvow77_HTejV1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c30faabbad3805115a2b5c
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Basic STH - status & unofficial poll
From: stelianm@php.net (Stelian Mocanita)

--001a11c30faabbad3805115a2b5c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Now you are just pushing the limits and doing things your way. Bob clearly
stated he does not want a vote and you want with an "unofficial poll"?

You need to learn to let things go their course and not always push matters
your way. I do not see how you can pull this move yet still be offended whe=
n
people call you out on political moves.

I hereby kindly ask you to retract this "unofficial poll" and let things go
their way,
whatever they might be.

On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:

> All,
>
>
>
> First, I decided not to propose Basic STH under my name, despite the fact=
 I
> think that not committing to put it to a vote adds unneeded risk for
> delivering STH in PHP 7.0.  Whether or not it=E2=80=99s put to a vote wil=
l be up to
> Bob.
>
>
>
> Secondly, I do want to attempt to understand what will happen if & when t=
he
> Basic STH RFC goes to a vote at some later point in the future (which
> according to Bob, will happen if the Dual Mode RFC fails).  If I see that
> Basic STH is going to fail, I=E2=80=99ll change my vote to be in favor of=
 the Dual
> Mode STH RFC,  call upon everyone to do the same, and retract my Coercive
> mode RFC.
>
>
>
> This unofficial-non-RFC poll is here:
> wiki.php.net/notrfc/scalar_type_hints
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Zeev
>

--001a11c30faabbad3805115a2b5c--