Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84912 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38351 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2015 21:03:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Mar 2015 21:03:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.52 mail-wg0-f52.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.52] ([74.125.82.52:36711] helo=mail-wg0-f52.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 47/88-31306-2A3F5055 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:03:31 -0500 Received: by wgra20 with SMTP id a20so25544814wgr.3 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 14:03:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:thread-index:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=mcu15IBQpvpvZZh3U+/unyIfVpkC7M02Npc90PiulkU=; b=CVLzaIGmbkVvvMm8TRbKGpj+yFRBhdAjH7LImVwOTxNtI3MdEAKnLI1L1sLYz++4Al 0pJCOjG/sc4ZYUb9+3iT/riHXQebGFz99X6aQgeDfEOkuJD0LRN4Sc0u16vWq0C295x0 ZTRw+RqtHQvGDGZyDF2UVoPQPTbukXhh+XKTmQVUVAKHB7F2s3dK5HQ2qCQVl2PTjIjA QyCkcBgZgdr8YtGLp9GeLi0OLiFGm6PsyPipQorlTsAw0/rXo+kHVKLCwTCEd3wbeC2X ECsc1eCUFGUC+4PBfjXgzOZnSB2+oLdFzcaqjmbnsBR5zFEsAY3GmbfpT5EYD/KpB+WW PwXg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlrw0hVpF11zj/+TjvcFgPFuG/jYWnHmq9Pal30jSBp4BcJZQ1rfRfYPb/wdnAcK62rKZBQYG78Y2IbEGeX24HDVJQCMx6RhD6cfsQFUKcituOEVrRT+MOJWP2s56ZY/OJoVfAkmH4L1HSGv42Iebjd6QDhog== X-Received: by 10.180.218.71 with SMTP id pe7mr144103762wic.70.1426453406669; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 14:03:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdBfY1FO+I+6BfgDRhqFxDLVNY3iMg== Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 23:03:26 +0200 Message-ID: To: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134b3c897f98e05115a103d Subject: Basic STH - status & unofficial poll From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) --001a1134b3c897f98e05115a103d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, First, I decided not to propose Basic STH under my name, despite the fact I think that not committing to put it to a vote adds unneeded risk for delivering STH in PHP 7.0. Whether or not it=E2=80=99s put to a vote will = be up to Bob. Secondly, I do want to attempt to understand what will happen if & when the Basic STH RFC goes to a vote at some later point in the future (which according to Bob, will happen if the Dual Mode RFC fails). If I see that Basic STH is going to fail, I=E2=80=99ll change my vote to be in favor of t= he Dual Mode STH RFC, call upon everyone to do the same, and retract my Coercive mode RFC. This unofficial-non-RFC poll is here: wiki.php.net/notrfc/scalar_type_hint= s Thanks, Zeev --001a1134b3c897f98e05115a103d--