Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84876
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender)
References: <BLU436-SMTP63B4758D2D902644C6BB24E2050@phx.gbl>
	<d29a6faab8dd07ce62f6df153c400b03@mail.gmail.com>	<BLU436-SMTP143F089828132E26A4D03EBE2050@phx.gbl>
	<e0b4a63b770a4e4df6864142f9262e90@mail.gmail.com> <CAAyV7nE3fu7mo7gj_9tUXp7xZeDttEO1H45TuD12O=0+QaKAjw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAyV7nE3fu7mo7gj_9tUXp7xZeDttEO1H45TuD12O=0+QaKAjw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Thread-Index: AQKV59C6R/g00R7Uu5aQCj/uhXIapAFVjcT/ASVgk7UBTkM7tAIvVM+um2MSqEA=
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:13:06 +0200
Message-ID: <3c4701e0d0d73e9b1393e204d945eb9f@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [INFO] Basic Scalar Types
From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmaxell@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2015 9:00 PM
> To: Zeev Suraski
> Cc: Bob Weinand; PHP Internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [INFO] Basic Scalar Types
>
> > Anthony welcomed competing RFCs, and in fact proposed it.  I don't see
> > how it would be sabotaging your RFC - when in fact it gives it a
> > chance to pass in a case Dual Mode manages to garner.
>
> I welcomed competing RFCs according to the accepted process **a month
> ago** (http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=142383869529695&w=2). I
> even extended voting on my RFC as a show of good faith. Please don't abuse
> that good faith to political ends.

There's nothing political about this and I do wish you stop portraying it as
such.  Instead of welcoming my proposal to get behind your (IMHO bad)
proposal, you're calling me political.  Can you commit to support the Basic
STH proposal if it gains something that's close to majority and more votes
than Dual?  For the sake of unity?

Whether it was a month ago or today is meaningless.  You did propose the
concept, and it applies for as long as RFCs can be handed in, which is
today.

Zeev