Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84853 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35756 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2015 17:32:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Mar 2015 17:32:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=markus@fischer.name; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=markus@fischer.name; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fischer.name from 62.179.121.49 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: markus@fischer.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 62.179.121.49 fep31.mx.upcmail.net Solaris 10 (beta) Received: from [62.179.121.49] ([62.179.121.49:49512] helo=fep31.mx.upcmail.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 62/E2-29489-232C5055 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 12:32:35 -0500 Received: from edge02.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.237]) by viefep31-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.05.05 201-2260-151-110-20120111) with ESMTP id <20150315173231.JQIZ3302.viefep31-int.chello.at@edge02.upcmail.net> for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 18:32:31 +0100 Received: from mail02.home ([213.47.1.174]) by edge02.upcmail.net with edge id 3tYd1q00b3lFLNl01tYdZN; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 18:32:38 +0100 X-SourceIP: 213.47.1.174 Received: from mail02.home ([192.168.1.14] helo=[IPv6:::1]) by mail02.home with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YXCOr-0003kN-Vj for internals@lists.php.net; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 18:32:30 +0100 Message-ID: <5505C22D.3010203@fischer.name> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 18:32:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "scanner01.home", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 15.03.15 16:46, Nikita Popov wrote: > To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes... > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote > > Voting is open for ten days :) From the RFC: "Signature mismatch during inheritance ... Possible alternative: Convert to E_DEPRECATED, if we intend to make this a fatal error in the future. " [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Reclassify E_STRICT notices From: markus@fischer.name (Markus Fischer) On 15.03.15 16:46, Nikita Popov wrote: > To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes... > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote > > Voting is open for ten days :) From the RFC: "Signature mismatch during inheritance ... Possible alternative: Convert to E_DEPRECATED, if we intend to make this a fatal error in the future. " Has there been any decision made which course to follow? I ask since I don't see voting option for it (not saying it needs one!), it just would be nice to carve in stone what's going to be done about it. Otherwise good cleanup RFC IMHO, +1 - Markus