Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84850 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28465 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2015 16:45:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Mar 2015 16:45:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.212.171 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.171 mail-wi0-f171.google.com Received: from [209.85.212.171] ([209.85.212.171:36740] helo=mail-wi0-f171.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D8/B1-29489-617B5055 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 11:45:11 -0500 Received: by wibg7 with SMTP id g7so20997431wib.1 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:45:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=w6R98LXoqs1SXwNP9Q2EKtRMA7beL7dTF5w6OA8R+mg=; b=NV26Ug1nmw94GERuBrlCoLW2tnyxrz/eADsZa+kJLITLY3brTebSO01JzlapzCAyAy +4yX/yTxlb5Y65+SW39gAu0NbgdtzLusQpatRibMQ/Qos/Mdo6SHpKJ7tTMUK8eFj9tn hxofz7qENpLELaCKdSVyfJjGFk2U941fIUNl2h42+MQpDNZyNcM6pKQL6fHuulXgbQlO FC+nI3yjqpPkWlcbWwlkleVC6caHK2FvBroepaWr7ZRu/s0XcpB7LYS7ooUsq91VqbVj azhG1a7SLDvOxWqrNVj/VjqTx884fLIZRnipZg7rrtvyjxeSioqXf9qYf/wYN/YRLTTL D8ng== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnPgi65sBptEdHAYdUMcoA6UD/QDp6+c+oiBPSohVGxg0WxiPLXh7Bmm5ufgWzA+aXiI9YseCgKO4i+LIcBKvfNLn/1eMNa2H88c1RULqXnmzz0vmqgM9mjk8LFQ+cnmnvuaFGVDKECwFhpSyEHMDJRiKSZkQ== X-Received: by 10.181.8.75 with SMTP id di11mr157725818wid.26.1426437908253; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:45:08 -0700 (PDT) References: <07EB6CE3-B002-42C8-9D5B-C53602609B0A@php.net> <2D43D245-31F0-4A5A-8B4B-DA6FF9B1C29D@php.net> <346ca92727ae5218bf88b811cfb4ea9b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQLGHNNJ/c4R6hyKqIhJTLJ5jFgUpgHykS3iAeWj+NECdAjWwwHMRK1CAeGtSsgCyd48VJrMIRFg Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 18:45:06 +0200 Message-ID: <697b0851a43fe2a074fc6d844e3b1c8c@mail.gmail.com> To: Philip Sturgeon Cc: Levi Morrison , Michael Wallner , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Voting irregularities From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) > -----Original Message----- > From: Philip Sturgeon [mailto:pjsturgeon@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2015 6:31 PM > To: Zeev Suraski > Cc: Levi Morrison; Michael Wallner; internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Voting irregularities > > Literally nothing Anthony said was ridiculous or a conspiracy theory. Phil, I disagree. 'New' voters voting sharply in favor of No strongly implies some sort of foul play. Why break it down otherwise? "I'm not saying that all of these votes are bad" is equivalent to saying "I am saying that some of these votes are bad". It's further strengthened by providing numbers of where this RFC would be at if these votes were discounted, as if it's on the table (that, I would argue, is the ridiculous part). Also, it really doesn't matter what you or I think about it. What matters is what everyone thinks about it. We already have one person understanding this email as a reason to look into when these accounts were created, and judging from the Twitter messages, he's not alone in suspecting some sort of foul play. I absolutely do think we should revisit our voting practices, but absolutely not in the context of a specific RFC, and not mid-flight. The quiet period after PHP 7's RFCs close could be an appropriate time for that. Zeev