Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84842 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 14529 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2015 15:57:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Mar 2015 15:57:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=morrison.levi@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=morrison.levi@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.53 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.218.53 mail-oi0-f53.google.com Received: from [209.85.218.53] ([209.85.218.53:33732] helo=mail-oi0-f53.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E5/FE-29489-5FBA5055 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:57:41 -0500 Received: by oibu204 with SMTP id u204so20065031oib.0 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 08:57:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pDIUbZK2LglhlpTnGAx4STuDcBi4h/BXNkeQeoJuGXg=; b=TcXr6lRdyQgYIS3z7CBwe++Hfw6nSJB6Mx5lms5pclNzR5FQpgcB0sM75hzHREq52d Gf/tpHuntm0bfgPZwVYn5ekSoJOgSDRorv08EAkFb/JgmstVn9v+Dih57SAbvpyAWXyx rTxMlLyfDGoK8+nhrADNBj/GeOxMeELadt+NbHULxE48P6RdSp6O4VXhc9LGct7pxsSf 6Ndw0vFcfoWJQTEBAbAFf8GlSepVTCLXutN/w7ycWXOfbOGnQEnTjfyb6XkiiSbTI3ms Zb0MDhxVDlym8PEQ4ILMqO7Wb9vR4F3H2wnDsj8N8hjPI4NNAOdh/J2pLOy6IhxInVU6 IxMg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.199.70 with SMTP id ji6mr44164269obc.3.1426435059058; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 08:57:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.90.74 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 08:57:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2D43D245-31F0-4A5A-8B4B-DA6FF9B1C29D@php.net> References: <07EB6CE3-B002-42C8-9D5B-C53602609B0A@php.net> <2D43D245-31F0-4A5A-8B4B-DA6FF9B1C29D@php.net> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:57:38 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: n_CgyV-fPzkmP8nP0TE2CpX3uQA Message-ID: To: Michael Wallner Cc: Anthony Ferrara , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Voting irregularities From: levim@php.net (Levi Morrison) On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Michael Wallner wrote: > > On 15 03 2015, at 16:23, Levi Morrison wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Michael Wallner wrote: > > > On 15 03 2015, at 15:19, Anthony Ferrara wrote: > > All, > > I ran some numbers on the current votes of the dual-mode vote right > now. There were a number of voters that I didn't recognize. So I > decided to pull some stats. > > The following voters never voted before the dual-mode RFC went up: > > dom - no > eliw - no > kguest - yes > kk - no > nohn - no > oliver - yes > richsage - yes > sammywg - no > spriebsch - no > srain - no > theseer - no > zimt - no > > Some of these names I recognize from list (sammywg and eliw), but many I = do > not. > > The interesting thing happens when you look at the voting direction. > > Currently, the RFC is slightly losing 70:37 (65.4%). > > If we look at percentages, 4.2% of yes voters have never voted in a > prior RFC. But a whopping 24.3% of no voters have never voted before. > > If we adjust the votes to remove these "never voted" accounts, it > stands at 67:28. Which is 70.5%. Which is basically where the vote was > prior to the competing RFC opening. > > I'm not saying that all of these are bad votes. Nor that they > shouldn't be counted. I think it does raise a significant question > around the voting practices. > > Something that I think we need to discuss as a group. > > So consider that discussion open. > > > Jeez, that is becoming ridiculous. So, if you=E2=80=99re that good in cou= nting, how > many did not vote before STHv0.3? > > > Is there a way to check when someone got a php.net account/karma? > > > http://people.php.net > I am aware of this, but unless I just missed it that site doesn't show *when* they got an account.