Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84833
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender)
Sender: Michael Wallner <mike.php.net@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_86E374DF-6CB3-4528-8B1C-0215690F9BDC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
In-Reply-To: <CAFMT4NpquvVtUv-UhKR_QDpKykw4L8toT61AnDM5nU9BKywJ9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:30:26 +0100
Cc: Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com>,
 "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Message-ID: <2D43D245-31F0-4A5A-8B4B-DA6FF9B1C29D@php.net>
References: <CAAyV7nEikYZNmaAnRy9hkRBnDDP=Ey43-nZbJGMHmQ_dAC_vgw@mail.gmail.com> <07EB6CE3-B002-42C8-9D5B-C53602609B0A@php.net> <CAFMT4NpquvVtUv-UhKR_QDpKykw4L8toT61AnDM5nU9BKywJ9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Voting irregularities
From: mike@php.net (Michael Wallner)

--Apple-Mail=_86E374DF-6CB3-4528-8B1C-0215690F9BDC
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8


> On 15 03 2015, at 16:23, Levi Morrison <levim@php.net> wrote:
>=20
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote:
>>=20
>>> On 15 03 2015, at 15:19, Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>>>=20
>>> All,
>>>=20
>>> I ran some numbers on the current votes of the dual-mode vote right
>>> now. There were a number of voters that I didn't recognize. So I
>>> decided to pull some stats.
>>>=20
>>> The following voters never voted before the dual-mode RFC went up:
>>>=20
>>> dom - no
>>> eliw - no
>>> kguest - yes
>>> kk - no
>>> nohn - no
>>> oliver - yes
>>> richsage - yes
>>> sammywg - no
>>> spriebsch - no
>>> srain - no
>>> theseer - no
>>> zimt - no
>>>=20
>>> Some of these names I recognize from list (sammywg and eliw), but =
many I do not.
>>>=20
>>> The interesting thing happens when you look at the voting direction.
>>>=20
>>> Currently, the RFC is slightly losing 70:37 (65.4%).
>>>=20
>>> If we look at percentages, 4.2% of yes voters have never voted in a
>>> prior RFC. But a whopping 24.3% of no voters have never voted =
before.
>>>=20
>>> If we adjust the votes to remove these "never voted" accounts, it
>>> stands at 67:28. Which is 70.5%. Which is basically where the vote =
was
>>> prior to the competing RFC opening.
>>>=20
>>> I'm not saying that all of these are bad votes. Nor that they
>>> shouldn't be counted. I think it does raise a significant question
>>> around the voting practices.
>>>=20
>>> Something that I think we need to discuss as a group.
>>>=20
>>> So consider that discussion open.
>>=20
>> Jeez, that is becoming ridiculous. So, if you=E2=80=99re that good in =
counting, how many did not vote before STHv0.3?
>=20
> Is there a way to check when someone got a php.net account/karma?

http://people.php.net <http://people.php.net/>


--Apple-Mail=_86E374DF-6CB3-4528-8B1C-0215690F9BDC--