Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84802 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 32874 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2015 06:59:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Mar 2015 06:59:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=marcio.web2@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=marcio.web2@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: marcio.web2@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.170 mail-lb0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.170] ([209.85.217.170:34202] helo=mail-lb0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D9/10-29489-6ED25055 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 01:59:50 -0500 Received: by lbbsy1 with SMTP id sy1so13223948lbb.1 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 23:59:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=lFqkbK8ea1H+jRAaLgwOH5aQXwhYoJwz51g/GBKwjz8=; b=NntLTRHYJXrGVGJNsR0gMVStG0wOu7ck6gvtPUbwM38Kd0salIzMC8Tj+8kUOaTnW9 Gv9ItIFH2/WGiA5Ts/FYdix3Ee5kMNTpEX84kpxfA9X7qAHbJJXe95s7k8s6gGYtGx8s 6sdKP6vEeDpLJQ2GLxA4roO5/XUxP7SNlfoBYuDh+YyS22IcmRRTO1yub6jypRNmvdCh iuhT03m5UhmteT+DZiUeO4LrQesf6f3ISIA+8B+Xg9SfTOiLvEOMyIcRuEJoMMk/vfxV K/VgfKGx/WDXcqZKKdSdFLKhrKOyUAuiqj4xGp7Jc6Rvw547K4dbkOwC/AWy4Ej2jDH+ bZMA== X-Received: by 10.112.110.231 with SMTP id id7mr49953508lbb.28.1426402787066; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 23:59:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.118.169 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 23:59:26 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: marcio3w@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 03:59:26 -0300 Message-ID: To: Marcio Almada Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134daf66e07aa05114e4786 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV][RFC][VOTE] Strict Argument Count On Function Calls From: marcio.web2@gmail.com (Marcio Almada) --001a1134daf66e07aa05114e4786 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I received some requests to update the RFC with more information about BC breaks + possible minor adjustments regarding dynamic function calls. So I decided to drop the current voting, while it's still on the beginning, to properly update the RFC. We had 7 votes computed - 4 "yes" and 3 "no" votes= . If you already voted, don't worry, it's just some minor changes and the voting will be restarted by the end of the day (March 15) so we don't loose the schedule. Another email will follow with a summary of what changed. Thanks for the comprehension. 2015-03-14 20:54 GMT-03:00 Marcio Almada : > Hi, > > The "Strict Argument Count" RFC is now on voting phase: > > RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/strict_argcount > PR: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1108 > > The voting will close in exactly 14 days counting from now (using the > date/time from this email as a reference). > > If you have any doubt about what was already discussed, please refer to > this aggregated markmail summary > http://markmail.org/thread/ol5s2vhw35ac2px3 > > Please read the RFC with full attention and good voting! :) > > Thanks, > M=C3=A1rcio > --001a1134daf66e07aa05114e4786--