Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84792
Return-Path: <marcio.web2@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 94874 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2015 23:55:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 14 Mar 2015 23:55:08 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=marcio.web2@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=marcio.web2@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.179 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: marcio.web2@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.179 mail-lb0-f179.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.217.179] ([209.85.217.179:36613] helo=mail-lb0-f179.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id EB/32-13042-85AC4055 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 18:55:05 -0500
Received: by lbcds1 with SMTP id ds1so10853186lbc.3
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 16:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=Zx11xSUoFtpiWMHlEGob3v++nWqTVYprhYSaJ+aEMXs=;
        b=ECwFI63Cp9LsJ0oJ6HHpOYxy4rn917EJneccDfnAeMcu9ffPN/7eY1+aoe2i1S+flG
         8ok9lVvVgs90Uw/JlnI3NwQ2Ch3p56Q/yFC/9Mi/o9HMRSSozFjSZF1J656Gr3nn0BhP
         HxgFRAsgWcTbwTuCAtu9Wsd7vN0Hf6qWGbVCIuMZBnUCvS1yzNRhsr6oDqA+US2zf5mp
         UCONdjMS4OicLmcMr9fwkxslEkp2EFLnfx9XLy0GjraAEhszPOKMDWMAl1mQneYkH78V
         /pHC8nCtlTuKTXtM6gyLS/VPvApPh/XKyn9SYZtFFAQ+ljBWVhE/fvvbUe8FkrBCuCAe
         zD1g==
X-Received: by 10.152.26.201 with SMTP id n9mr48397128lag.29.1426377301496;
 Sat, 14 Mar 2015 16:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.118.169 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 16:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: marcio3w@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 20:54:41 -0300
Message-ID: <CAOsHV+uYLVuOhva_wpyGouHg5c8+ajko0m8CN1aU2HARcyga3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160a7065f1d2605114858cb
Subject: [PHP-DEV][RFC][VOTE] Strict Argument Count On Function Calls
From: marcio.web2@gmail.com (Marcio Almada)

--089e0160a7065f1d2605114858cb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

The "Strict Argument Count" RFC is now on voting phase:

RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/strict_argcount
PR: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1108

The voting will close in exactly 14 days counting from now (using the
date/time from this email as a reference).

If you have any doubt about what was already discussed, please refer to
this aggregated markmail summary http://markmail.org/thread/ol5s2vhw35ac2px=
3

Please read the RFC with full attention and good voting! :)

Thanks,
M=C3=A1rcio

--089e0160a7065f1d2605114858cb--